Learning Global Hypothesis Space for Enhancing Synergistic Reasoning Chain
Jiaquan Zhang, Chaoning Zhang, Shuxu Chen, Xudong Wang, Zhenzhen Huang, Pengcheng Zheng, Shuai Yuan, Sheng Zheng, Qigan Sun, Jie Zou, Lik-Hang Lee, Yang Yang
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has been shown to significantly improve the reasoning accuracy of large language models (LLMs) on complex tasks. However, due to the autoregressive, step-by-step generation paradigm, existing CoT methods suffer from two fundamental limitations. First, the reasoning process is highly susceptible to early-stage errors, which tend to propagate and amplify without a global coordination and correction mechanism, thereby distorting the overall reasoning chain. Second, current CoT methods lack structured analytical frameworks for pruning redundant reasoning and identifying critical reasoning features, resulting in instability and reduced interpretability. To address these issues, we propose Global Hypothesis Structure via Topological Data Analysis (GHS-TDA), which constructs a semantically enriched global hypothesis graph that integrates and coordinates multiple candidate reasoning paths, thereby supporting global consistency refinement and error mitigation. GHS-TDA applies persistent homology-based topological data analysis to capture stable multi-scale structures, remove redundancy and inconsistencies, and extract a more reliable reasoning skeleton. By jointly leveraging reasoning diversity and topological stability, GHS-TDA achieves self-adaptive convergence, produces high-confidence and interpretable reasoning paths, and consistently outperforms strong baselines in terms of both accuracy and robustness across multiple reasoning benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c59cda2a-21bb-4942-a299-a009c540e304Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLMsZhen Xiong, Yujun Cai, Zhecheng Li, Yiwei WangEMNLP 2025
- What Makes a Good Reasoning Chain? Uncovering Structural Patterns in Long Chain-of-Thought ReasoningGangwei Jiang, Yahui Liu, Zhaoyi Li, Wei Bi et al.EMNLP 2025
- Large Language Models as Topological Thinkers: A Benchmark on Graph Persistent HomologyHao Li, Hao Wan, Yixue Huang, Yuzhou Chen et al.ICML 2026
- Text summarization via global structure awarenessJiaquan Zhang, Chaoning Zhang, Shuxu Chen, Yibei Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Clustering as Reasoning: A -Means Interpretation of Chain-of-Thought Graph LearningXuanting Xie, Zhaochen Guo, Bingheng Li, Xingtong Yu et al.ICML 2026
