Learning via Wasserstein-Based High Probability Generalisation Bounds
Paul Viallard, Maxime Haddouche, Umut Simsekli, Benjamin Guedj
Abstract
Minimising upper bounds on the population risk or the generalisation gap has been widely used in structural risk minimisation (SRM) -- this is in particular at the core of PAC-Bayesian learning. Despite its successes and unfailing surge of interest in recent years, a limitation of the PAC-Bayesian framework is that most bounds involve a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence term (or its variations), which might exhibit erratic behavior and fail to capture the underlying geometric structure of the learning problem -- hence restricting its use in practical applications. As a remedy, recent studies have attempted to replace the KL divergence in the PAC-Bayesian bounds with the Wasserstein distance. Even though these bounds alleviated the aforementioned issues to a certain extent, they either hold in expectation, are for bounded losses, or are nontrivial to minimize in an SRM framework. In this work, we contribute to this line of research and prove novel Wasserstein distance-based PAC-Bayesian generalisation bounds for both batch learning with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, and online learning with potentially non-i.i.d. data. Contrary to previous art, our bounds are stronger in the sense that (i) they hold with high probability, (ii) they apply to unbounded (potentially heavy-tailed) losses, and (iii) they lead to optimizable training objectives that can be used in SRM. As a result we derive novel Wasserstein-based PAC-Bayesian learning algorithms and we illustrate their empirical advantage on a variety of experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c5475f97-348a-4e93-b2aa-84f8dbcf7e18Cited by top-tier papers3
- Learning via Surrogate PAC-BayesAntoine Picard-Weibel, Roman Moscoviz, Benjamin GuedjNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- PAC-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Trains Generalizable PoliciesAbdelkrim ZITOUNI, Mehdi Hennequin, Juba Agoun, Ryan Horache et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Bridging the Gap: Teacher-Assisted Wasserstein Knowledge Distillation for Efficient Multi-Modal RecommendationZiyi Zhuang, Hanwen Du, Hui Han, Youhua Li et al.WWW 2025
Builds on13
- PACOH: Bayes-Optimal Meta-Learning with PAC-GuaranteesJonas Rothfuss, Vincent Fortuin, Martin Josifoski, Andreas KrauseICML 2021 · 136 citations
- PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain GeneralizationSanae Lotfi, Marc Finzi, Sanyam Kapoor, Andres Potapczynski et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 98 citations
- Tighter Expected Generalization Error Bounds via Wasserstein DistanceBorja Rodríguez Gálvez, Germán Bassi, Ragnar Thobaben, Mikael SkoglundNeurIPS 2021 · 52 citations
- Generalization Bounds for Meta-Learning via PAC-Bayes and Uniform StabilityAlec Farid, Anirudha MajumdarNeurIPS 2021 · 46 citations
- Fractal Structure and Generalization Properties of Stochastic Optimization AlgorithmsAlexander Camuto, George Deligiannidis, Murat A. Erdogdu, Mert Gürbüzbalaban et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Shedding a PAC-Bayesian Light on Adaptive Sliced-Wasserstein DistancesRuben Ohana, Kimia Nadjahi, Alain Rakotomamonjy, Liva RalaivolaICML 2023 · 7 citations
- PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds for Adversarial Generative ModelsSokhna Diarra Mbacke, Florence Clerc, Pascal GermainICML 2023 · 12 citations
- Integral Probability Metrics PAC-Bayes BoundsRon Amit, Baruch Epstein, Shay Moran, Ron MeirNeurIPS 2022 · 25 citations
- A Unified View on PAC-Bayes Bounds for Meta-LearningArezou RezazadehICML 2022 · 13 citations
- Statistical Guarantees for Variational Autoencoders using PAC-Bayesian TheorySokhna Diarra Mbacke, Florence Clerc, Pascal GermainNeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
