Leveraging Discrete Function Decomposability for Scientific Design
James C. Bowden, Sergey Levine, Jennifer Listgarten
Abstract
In the era of AI-driven science and engineering, we often want to design discrete objects in silico according to user-specified properties. For example, we may wish to design a protein to bind its target, arrange components within a circuit to minimize latency, or find materials with certain properties. Given a property predictive model, in silico design typically involves training a generative model over the design space (e.g., protein sequence space) to concentrate on designs with the desired properties. Distributional optimizationwhich can be formalized as an estimation of distribution algorithm or as reinforcement learning policy optimizationfinds the generative model that maximizes an objective function in expectation. Optimizing a distribution over discrete-valued designs is in general challenging because of the combinatorial nature of the design space. However, many property predictors in scientific applications are decomposable in the sense that they can be factorized over design variables in a way that could in principle enable more effective optimization. For example, amino acids at a catalytic site of a protein may only loosely interact with amino acids of the rest of the protein to achieve maximal catalytic activity. Current distributional optimization algorithms are unable to make use of such decomposability structure. Herein, we propose and demonstrate use of a new distributional optimization algorithm, Decomposition-Aware Distributional Optimization (DADO), that can leverage any decomposability defined by a junction tree on the design variables, to make optimization more efficient. At its core, DADO employs a soft-factorized"search distribution"a learned generative modelfor efficient navigation of the search space, invoking graph message-passing to coordinate optimization across linked factors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on6
- Conservative Objective Models for Effective Offline Model-Based OptimizationBrandon Trabucco, Aviral Kumar, Xinyang Geng, Sergey LevineICML 2021 · 119 citations
- Autofocused oracles for model-based designClara Fannjiang, Jennifer ListgartenNeurIPS 2020 · 90 citations
- Are Random Decompositions all we need in High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation?Juliusz Krysztof Ziomek, Haitham Bou-AmmarICML 2023 · 39 citations
- Bridging Model-Based Optimization and Generative Modeling via Conservative Fine-Tuning of Diffusion ModelsMasatoshi Uehara, Yulai Zhao, Ehsan Hajiramezanali, Gabriele Scalia et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
- High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Tree-Structured Additive ModelsEric Han, Ishank Arora, Jonathan ScarlettAAAI 2021 · 26 citations
Related papers
- DisCo-DSO: Coupling Discrete and Continuous Optimization for Efficient Generative Design in Hybrid SpacesJacob F. Pettit, Chak Shing Lee, Jiachen Yang, Alex Ho et al.AAAI 2025
- Goal-directed Generation of Discrete Structures with Conditional Generative ModelsAmina Mollaysa, Brooks Paige, Alexandros KalousisNeurIPS 2020 · 12 citations
- Causal Structure-guided Distributionally Robust Optimization under Domain ShiftsSeonggyeom Kim, Eunjung Choi, Dong-Kyu ChaeKDD 2026
- Variational Search DistributionsDaniel M. Steinberg, Rafael Oliveira, Cheng Soon Ong, Edwin V. BonillaICLR 2025
- Model-based reinforcement learning for biological sequence designChristof Angermüller, David Dohan, David Belanger, Ramya Deshpande et al.ICLR 2020 · 159 citations
