Lune

ICLR2026Top-tier venue

Measuring Uncertainty Calibration

Kamil Ciosek, Nicolò Felicioni, Sina Ghiassian, Juan Elenter Litwin, Francesco Tonolini, David Gustaffson, Eva Garcia Martin, Carmen Gonzalez, Raphaëlle Bertrand-Lalo

2026Year
1Citations

Abstract

We make two contributions to the problem of estimating the L1L_1 calibration error of a binary classifier from a finite dataset. First, we provide an upper bound for any classifier where the calibration function has bounded variation. Second, we provide a method of modifying any classifier so that its calibration error can be upper bounded efficiently without significantly impacting classifier performance and without any restrictive assumptions. All our results are non-asymptotic and distribution-free. We conclude by providing advice on how to measure calibration error in practice. Our methods yield practical procedures that can be run on real-world datasets with modest overhead.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on2

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines