Auto-Test: Learning Semantic-Domain Constraints for Unsupervised Error Detection in Tables
Qixu Chen, Yeye He, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Weiwei Cui, Song Ge, Haidong Zhang, Dongmei Zhang, Surajit Chaudhuri
Abstract
Data cleaning is a long-standing challenge in data management. While powerful logic and statistical algorithms have been developed to detect and repair data errors in tables, existing algorithms predominantly rely on domain-experts to first manually specify data-quality constraints specific to a given table, before data cleaning algorithms can be applied.
In this work, we propose a new class of data-quality constraints that we call Semantic-Domain Constraints, which can be reliably inferred and automatically applied to any tables, without requiring domain-experts to manually specify on a per-table basis. We develop a principled framework to systematically learn such constraints from table corpora using large-scale statistical tests, which can further be distilled into a core set of constraints using our optimization framework, with provable quality guarantees. Extensive evaluations show that this new class of constraints can be used to both (1) directly detect errors on real tables in the wild, and (2) augment existing expert-driven data-cleaning techniques as a new class of complementary constraints.
Our extensively labeled benchmark dataset with 2400 real data columns, as well as our code are available at https://github.com/qixuchen/AutoTest to facilitate future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- DeepPrep: An LLM-Powered Agentic System for Autonomous Data PreparationMeihao Fan, Ju Fan, Yuxin Zhang, Shaolei Zhang et al.VLDB 2026 · 4 citations
- Table-LLM-Specialist: Language Model Specialists for Tables using Iterative Fine-tuningJunjie Xing, Yeye He, Mengyu Zhou, Haoyu Dong et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language ModelsYurong Liu, Yeye He, Haoyu Dong, Junjie Xing et al.VLDB 2026
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?Avanika Narayan, Ines Chami, Laurel J. Orr, Christopher RéVLDB 2023 · 325 citations
- Annotating Columns with Pre-trained Language ModelsYoshihiko Suhara, Jinfeng Li, Yuliang Li, Dan Zhang et al.SIGMOD 2022 · 81 citations
- ArcheType: A Novel Framework for Open-Source Column Type Annotation using Large Language ModelsBenjamin Feuer, Yurong Liu, Chinmay Hegde, Juliana FreireVLDB 2024 · 33 citations
Related papers
- How and Why False Denial Constraints are DiscoveredAlbert Martin, Eduardo C. de Almeida, Oscar Romero, Anna QueraltVLDB 2025 · 1 citation
- SCODED: Statistical Constraint Oriented Data Error DetectionJing Nathan Yan, Oliver Schulte, Mohan Zhang, Jiannan Wang et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 32 citations
- Discovery of Approximate (and Exact) Denial ConstraintsEduardo H. M. Pena, Eduardo C. de Almeida, Felix NaumannVLDB 2020 · 79 citations
- Guardrail: Automated Integrity Constraint Synthesis From Noisy DataPingchuan Ma, Zhaoyu Wang, Zhenlan Ji, Zongjie Li et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 1 citation
- DCDiscover: Mining Threshold Denial Constraints from Time Series DataXiaoou Ding, Muyun Zhou, Yida Liu, Zekai Qian et al.ICDE 2025 · 1 citation
