Identifying and Mitigating Spurious Correlation in Multi-Task Learning
Junyi Chai, Shenyu Lu, Xiaoqian Wang
Abstract
Multi-task learning (MTL) is a paradigm that aims to improve the generalization of models by simultaneously learning multiple related tasks, leveraging shared representations and task-specific information to enhance performance on individual tasks. However, existing work has shown that MTL can potentially hinder generalization, with one key factor being spurious correlations between tasks. Owing to the knowledge-sharing property, the per-task predictors are more likely to develop reliance on spurious features. Most existing approaches address this issue through distributional robustness, aiming to maintain consistent performance across different distributions under unknown covariate shifts. However, this formulation lacks theoretical guarantees and can be sensitive to the construction of covariate shifts. In this work, we propose a novel perspective, where we seek to identify spurious correlations between tasks. Drawing inspirations from conventional formulations on spurious correlation, for each task, we propose to distinguish its spurious tasks using the difference in correlation coefficients between the empirical distribution and class-wise resampled distributions, thereby capturing the correlations between task labels w.r.t. each class. We prove theoretically the feasibility of the resampling strategy in characterizing spurious correlations between tasks. Furthermore, we propose a simple fine-tuning strategy, debiased adversarial training, where the per-task predictors are adversarially trained to disregard information associated with their spurious tasks. Experimental results on six benchmark datasets show that our method effectively mitigates spurious correlations and outperforms state-of-theart methods in improving generalization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on27
- Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task LearningTianhe Yu, Saurabh Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Sergey Levine et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,261 citations
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan et al.ICML 2021 · 683 citations
- Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?Trevor Standley, Amir Zamir, Dawn Chen, Leonidas J. Guibas et al.ICML 2020 · 651 citations
- An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious CorrelationsShiori Sagawa, Aditi Raghunathan, Pang Wei Koh, Percy LiangICML 2020 · 436 citations
- The Risks of Invariant Risk MinimizationElan Rosenfeld, Pradeep Kumar Ravikumar, Andrej RisteskiICLR 2021 · 356 citations
Related papers
- Improving Multi-Task Generalization via Regularizing Spurious CorrelationZiniu Hu, Zhe Zhao, Xinyang Yi, Tiansheng Yao et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 46 citations
- Spuriousness-Aware Meta-Learning for Learning Robust ClassifiersGuangtao Zheng, Wenqian Ye, Aidong ZhangKDD 2024 · 3 citations
- Let Samples Speak: Mitigating Spurious Correlation by Exploiting the Clusterness of SamplesWeiwei Li, Junzhuo Liu, Yuanyuan Ren, Yuchen Zheng et al.CVPR 2025
- Multi-Task Representation Alignment on Language Understanding: A Mutual Information PerspectiveDou Hu, Lingwei Wei, Hongjiang Xiao, Songlin Hu et al.ACL 2026
- Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution ShiftChunting Zhou, Xuezhe Ma, Paul Michel, Graham NeubigICML 2021 · 78 citations
