Where We Have Arrived in Proving the Emergence of Sparse Interaction Primitives in DNNs
Qihan Ren, Jiayang Gao, Wen Shen, Quanshi Zhang
Abstract
This paper aims to prove the emergence of symbolic concepts in well-trained AI models. We prove that if (1) the high-order derivatives of the model output w.r.t. the input variables are all zero, (2) the AI model can be used on occluded samples and will yield higher confidence when the input sample is less occluded, and (3) the confidence of the AI model does not significantly degrade on occluded samples, then the AI model will encode sparse interactive concepts. Each interactive concept represents an interaction between a specific set of input variables, and has a certain numerical effect on the inference score of the model. Specifically, it is proved that the inference score of the model can always be represented as the sum of the interaction effects of all interactive concepts. In fact, we hope to prove that conditions for the emergence of symbolic concepts are quite common. It means that for most AI models, we can usually use a small number of interactive concepts to mimic the model outputs on any arbitrarily masked samples.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c4380054-bedb-4c5b-b174-aaea88b7aaabCited by top-tier papers12
- Towards the Dynamics of a DNN Learning Symbolic InteractionsQihan Ren, Junpeng Zhang, Yang Xu, Yue Xin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- ProxySPEX: Inference-Efficient Interpretability via Sparse Feature Interactions in LLMsLandon Butler, Abhineet Agarwal, Justin Singh Kang, Yigit Efe Erginbas et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Is the MMI Criterion Necessary for Interpretability? Degenerating Non-causal Features to Plain Noise for Self-RationalizationWei Liu, Zhiying Deng, Zhongyu Niu, Jun Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Learning to Understand: Identifying Interactions via the Möbius TransformJustin Singh Kang, Yigit Efe Erginbas, Landon Butler, Ramtin Pedarsani et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Defining and extracting generalizable interaction primitives from DNNsLu Chen, Siyu Lou, Benhao Huang, Quanshi ZhangICLR 2024 · 17 citations
Builds on9
- The Shapley Taylor Interaction IndexMukund Sundararajan, Kedar Dhamdhere, Ashish AgarwalICML 2020 · 199 citations
- A Unified Approach to Interpreting and Boosting Adversarial TransferabilityXin Wang, Jie Ren, Shuyun Lin, Xiangming Zhu et al.ICLR 2021 · 113 citations
- Discovering and Explaining the Representation Bottleneck of DNNSHuiqi Deng, Qihan Ren, Hao Zhang, Quanshi ZhangICLR 2022 · 73 citations
- Interpreting Multivariate Shapley Interactions in DNNsHao Zhang, Yichen Xie, Longjie Zheng, Die Zhang et al.AAAI 2021 · 70 citations
- Interpreting and Boosting Dropout from a Game-Theoretic ViewHao Zhang, Sen Li, Yinchao Ma, Mingjie Li et al.ICLR 2021 · 53 citations
Related papers
- Defining and Quantifying the Emergence of Sparse Concepts in DNNsJie Ren, Mingjie Li, Qirui Chen, Huiqi Deng et al.CVPR 2023
- Towards the Difficulty for a Deep Neural Network to Learn Concepts of Different ComplexitiesDongrui Liu, Huiqi Deng, Xu Cheng, Qihan Ren et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
- Does a Neural Network Really Encode Symbolic Concepts?Mingjie Li, Quanshi ZhangICML 2023 · 35 citations
- Bayesian Neural Networks Avoid Encoding Complex and Perturbation-Sensitive ConceptsQihan Ren, Huiqi Deng, Yunuo Chen, Siyu Lou et al.ICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Interaction Asymmetry: A General Principle for Learning Composable AbstractionsJack Brady, Julius von Kügelgen, Sébastien Lachapelle, Simon Buchholz et al.ICLR 2025
