Importance Sampling for Multi-Negative Multimodal Direct Preference Optimization
Xintong Li, Chuhan Wang, Junda Wu, Rohan Surana, Tong Yu, Julian J. McAuley, Jingbo Shang
Abstract
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently been extended from text-only models to vision-language models. However, existing methods rely on oversimplified pairwise comparisons, generating a single negative image via basic perturbations or similarity-based retrieval, which fail to capture the complex nature of multimodal preferences, inducing optimization bias and hallucinations. To address this issue, we propose MISP-DPO, the first framework to incorporate multiple, semantically diverse negative images in multimodal DPO via the Plackett-Luce model. Our method embeds prompts and candidate images in CLIP (Contrastive Language–Image Pre-training) space and applies a sparse autoencoder to uncover semantic deviations into interpretable factors. Negative samples are selected based on reconstruction difficulty, semantic deviation from the positive, and mutual diversity, yielding broader and more informative supervision. To handle multi-negative comparisons, we adopt a Plackett–Luce objective and introduce an importance sampling strategy that improves training efficiency. Experiments across five diverse benchmarks demonstrate that MISP-DPO consistently improves multimodal alignment over prior methods, validating the effectiveness of semantic-aware, multi-negative sampling in preference-based learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
- On Softmax Direct Preference Optimization for RecommendationYuxin Chen, Junfei Tan, An Zhang, Zhengyi Yang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 126 citations
Related papers
- mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language ModelsFei Wang, Wenxuan Zhou, James Y. Huang, Nan Xu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 11 citations
- Guiding Cross-Modal Representations with MLLM Priors via Preference AlignmentPengfei Zhao, Rongbo Luan, Wei Zhang, Peng Wu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Aligning Visual Contrastive learning models via Preference OptimizationAmirabbas Afzali, Borna Khodabandeh, Ali Rasekh, Mahyar JafariNodeh et al.ICLR 2025
- Learning from Fine-Grained Visual Discrepancies: Mitigating Multimodal Hallucinations via In-Context Visual Contrastive OptimizationHaolin Deng, Xin Zou, Zhiwei Jin, Chen Chen et al.ICML 2026
- Non-Contrastive Learning Meets Language-Image Pre-TrainingJinghao Zhou, Li Dong, Zhe Gan, Lijuan Wang et al.CVPR 2023
