POISED: Spotting Twitter Spam Off the Beaten Paths
Shirin Nilizadeh, Francois Labreche, Alireza Sedighian, Ali Zand, José M. Fernandez, Christopher Kruegel, Gianluca Stringhini, Giovanni Vigna
Abstract
Cybercriminals have found in online social networks a propitious medium to spread spam and malicious content. Existing techniques for detecting spam include predicting the trustworthiness of accounts and analyzing the content of these messages. However, advanced attackers can still successfully evade these defenses. Online social networks bring people who have personal connections or share common interests to form communities. In this paper, we first show that users within a networked community share some topics of interest. Moreover, content shared on these social network tend to propagate according to the interests of people. Dissemination paths may emerge where some communities post similar messages, based on the interests of those communities. Spam and other malicious content, on the other hand, follow different spreading patterns. In this paper, we follow this insight and present POISED, a system that leverages the differences in propagation between benign and malicious messages on social networks to identify spam and other unwanted content. We test our system on a dataset of 1.3M tweets collected from 64K users, and we show that our approach is effective in detecting malicious messages, reaching 91% precision and 93% recall. We also show that POISED's detection is more comprehensive than previous systems, by comparing it to three state-of-the-art spam detection systems that have been proposed by the research community in the past. POISED significantly outperforms each of these systems. Moreover, through simulations, we show how POISED is effective in the early detection of spam messages and how it is resilient against two well-known adversarial machine learning attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c40bb52c-3411-45b2-ba6e-b7db001335faCited by top-tier papers11
- Transcending TRANSCEND: Revisiting Malware Classification in the Presence of Concept DriftFederico Barbero, Feargus Pendlebury, Fabio Pierazzi, Lorenzo CavallaroS&P 2022 · 124 citations
- Deep Entity Classification: Abusive Account Detection for Online Social NetworksTeng Xu, Gerard Goossen, Huseyin Kerem Cevahir, Sara Khodeir et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 41 citations
- TrollMagnifier: Detecting State-Sponsored Troll Accounts on RedditMohammad Hammas Saeed, Shiza Ali, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro et al.S&P 2022 · 40 citations
- Understanding the Behaviors of Toxic Accounts on RedditDeepak Kumar, Jeff T. Hancock, Kurt Thomas, Zakir DurumericWWW 2023 · 31 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Graph Convolutional Networks with Markov Random Field Reasoning for Social Spammer DetectionYongji Wu, Defu Lian, Yiheng Xu, Le Wu et al.AAAI 2020 · 194 citations
- Deceptive Previews: A Study of the Link Preview Trustworthiness in Social PlatformsGiada Stivala, Giancarlo PellegrinoNDSS 2020
- Preemptive Detection of Fake Accounts on Social Networks via Multi-Class Preferential Attachment ClassifiersAdam Breuer, Nazanin Khosravani Tehrani, Michael Tingley, Bradford CottelKDD 2023 · 7 citations
- Networks and Influencers in Online Propaganda Events: A Comparative Study of Three Cases in IndiaAnirban Sen, Soham De, Joyojeet PalCSCW 2024 · 2 citations
- BotMoE: Twitter Bot Detection with Community-Aware Mixtures of Modal-Specific ExpertsYuhan Liu, Zhaoxuan Tan, Heng Wang, Shangbin Feng et al.SIGIR 2023 · 54 citations
