Non-parametric Representation Learning with Kernels
Pascal Mattia Esser, Maximilian Fleissner, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar
Abstract
Unsupervised and self-supervised representation learning has become popular in recent years for learning useful features from unlabelled data. Representation learning has been mostly developed in the neural network literature, and other models for representation learning are surprisingly unexplored. In this work, we introduce and analyze several kernel-based representation learning approaches: Firstly, we define two kernel Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) models using contrastive loss functions and secondly, a Kernel Autoencoder (AE) model based on the idea of embedding and reconstructing data. We argue that the classical representer theorems for supervised kernel machines are not always applicable for (self-supervised) representation learning, and present new representer theorems, which show that the representations learned by our kernel models can be expressed in terms of kernel matrices. We further derive generalisation error bounds for representation learning with kernel SSL and AE, and empirically evaluate the performance of these methods in both small data regimes as well as in comparison with neural network based models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c3a5e37e-175d-4e6b-b1a1-dbb9f3d68346Cited by top-tier papers4
- Towards Understanding How Transformers Learn In-context Through a Representation Learning LensRuifeng Ren, Yong LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- When Can We Approximate Wide Contrastive Models with Neural Tangent Kernels and Principal Component Analysis?Gautham Govind Anil, Pascal Mattia Esser, Debarghya GhoshdastidarAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Leveraging semantic similarity for experimentation with AI-generated treatmentsLei Shi, David Arbour, Raghavendra Addanki, Ritwik Sinha et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Interpretable Self-Supervised Learning via Representer Landmarks and Nyström ApproximationMaedeh Zarvandi, Michael Timothy, Theresa Wasserer, Debarghya GhoshdastidarICML 2026
Builds on8
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised LearningAdrien Bardes, Jean Ponce, Yann LeCunICLR 2022 · 1,226 citations
- On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantChaoyue Liu, Libin Zhu, Mikhail BelkinNeurIPS 2020 · 183 citations
- Max-Margin Contrastive LearningAnshul Shah, Suvrit Sra, Rama Chellappa, Anoop CherianAAAI 2022 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Graph Autoencoders as Implicit Contrastive LearnersJintang Li, Ruofan Wu, Yuchang Zhu, Huizhe Zhang et al.KDD 2026 · 3 citations
- Contrastive Learning Can Find An Optimal Basis For Approximately View-Invariant FunctionsDaniel D. Johnson, Ayoub El Hanchi, Chris J. MaddisonICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- A theoretical study of inductive biases in contrastive learningJeff Z. HaoChen, Tengyu MaICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- Memorization in Self-Supervised Learning Improves Downstream GeneralizationWenhao Wang, Muhammad Ahmad Kaleem, Adam Dziedzic, Michael Backes et al.ICLR 2024 · 19 citations
- How Mask Matters: Towards Theoretical Understandings of Masked AutoencodersQi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2022 · 119 citations
