Data-Independent Neural Pruning via Coresets
Ben Mussay, Margarita Osadchy, Vladimir Braverman, Samson Zhou, Dan Feldman
Abstract
Previous work showed empirically that large neural networks can be significantly reduced in size while preserving their accuracy. Model compression became a central research topic, as it is crucial for deployment of neural networks on devices with limited computational and memory resources. The majority of the compression methods are based on heuristics and offer no worst-case guarantees on the trade-off between the compression rate and the approximation error for an arbitrarily new sample. We propose the first efficient, data-independent neural pruning algorithm with a provable trade-off between its compression rate and the approximation error for any future test sample. Our method is based on the coreset framework, which finds a small weighted subset of points that provably approximates the original inputs. Specifically, we approximate the output of a layer of neurons by a coreset of neurons in the previous layer and discard the rest. We apply this framework in a layer-by-layer fashion from the top to the bottom. Unlike previous works, our coreset is data independent, meaning that it provably guarantees the accuracy of the function for any input , including an adversarial one. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on popular network architectures. In particular, our coresets yield 90% compression of the LeNet-300-100 architecture on MNIST while improving the accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c37d729c-8fe3-4d14-b376-56c0290ff180Cited by top-tier papers20
- Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly DetectionKarsten Roth, Latha Pemula, Joaquin Zepeda, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.CVPR 2022 · 1,301 citations
- A Fast Post-Training Pruning Framework for TransformersWoosuk Kwon, Sehoon Kim, Michael W. Mahoney, Joseph Hassoun et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 247 citations
- Good Subnetworks Provably Exist: Pruning via Greedy Forward SelectionMao Ye, Chengyue Gong, Lizhen Nie, Denny Zhou et al.ICML 2020 · 123 citations
- Sanity-Checking Pruning Methods: Random Tickets can Win the JackpotJingtong Su, Yihang Chen, Tianle Cai, Tianhao Wu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 100 citations
- Adversarial Robustness of Streaming Algorithms through Importance SamplingVladimir Braverman, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Mariano Schain et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 56 citations
Related papers
- Pruning Neural Networks via Coresets and Convex Geometry: Towards No AssumptionsMurad Tukan, Loay Mualem, Alaa MaaloufNeurIPS 2022 · 29 citations
- Data-Efficient Structured Pruning via Submodular OptimizationMarwa El Halabi, Suraj Srinivas, Simon Lacoste-JulienNeurIPS 2022 · 31 citations
- Greedy Optimization Provably Wins the Lottery: Logarithmic Number of Winning Tickets is EnoughMao Ye, Lemeng Wu, Qiang LiuNeurIPS 2020 · 17 citations
- Provable Filter Pruning for Efficient Neural NetworksLucas Liebenwein, Cenk Baykal, Harry Lang, Dan Feldman et al.ICLR 2020 · 161 citations
- Compressing Neural Networks: Towards Determining the Optimal Layer-wise DecompositionLucas Liebenwein, Alaa Maalouf, Dan Feldman, Daniela RusNeurIPS 2021 · 60 citations
