Lune

EMNLP2025Top-tier venue

T2: An Adaptive Test-Time Scaling Strategy for Contextual Question Answering

Zhengyi Zhao, Shubo Zhang, Zezhong Wang, Huimin Wang, Yutian Zhao, Bin Liang, Yefeng Zheng, Binyang Li, Kam-Fai Wong, Xian Wu

Abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in Contextual Question Answering (CQA). However, prior approaches typically employ elaborate reasoning strategies regardless of question complexity, leading to low adaptability. Recent efficient test-time scaling methods introduce budget constraints or early stop mechanisms to avoid overthinking for straightforward questions. But they add human bias to the reasoning process and fail to leverage models' inherent reasoning capabilities. To address these limitations, we present T 2 : Think-to-Think, a novel framework that dynamically adapts reasoning depth based on question complexity. T 2 leverages the insight that if an LLM can effectively solve similar questions using specific reasoning strategies, it can apply the same strategy to the original question. This insight enables the adoption of concise reasoning for straightforward questions while maintaining detailed analysis for complex problems. T 2 works through four key steps: decomposing questions into structural elements, generating similar examples with candidate reasoning strategies, evaluating these strategies against multiple criteria, and applying the most appropriate strategy to the original question. Experimental evaluation across seven diverse CQA benchmarks demonstrates that T 2 not only achieves higher accuracy than baseline methods but also reduces computational overhead by up to 25.2%.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on13

  1. Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
  2. Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
  3. Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
  4. Active Retrieval Augmented GenerationZhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, Luyu Gao, Zhiqing Sun et al.EMNLP 2023 · 315 citations
  5. Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language ModelsOfir Press, Muru Zhang, Sewon Min, Ludwig Schmidt et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 296 citations

Related papers

  1. Thought calibration: Efficient and confident test-time scalingMenghua Wu, Cai Zhou, Stephen Bates, Tommi S. JaakkolaEMNLP 2025 · 12 citations
  2. Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking TokensWei-Lin Chen, Liqian Peng, Tian Tan, Chao Zhao et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
  3. When More Thinking Hurts: Overthinking in LLM Test-Time Compute ScalingShu Zhou, Rui Ling, Junan Chen, Xin Wang et al.ACL Findings 2026
  4. Plan and Budget: Effective and Efficient Test-Time Scaling on Reasoning Large Language ModelsJunhong Lin, Xinyue Zeng, Jie Zhu, Song Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 30 citations
  5. The Evolution of Thought: Tracking LLM Overthinking via Reasoning Dynamics AnalysisZihao Wei, Liang Pang, Jiahao Liu, Wenjie Shi et al.ACL 2026 · 14 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines