Geometric and Physical Constraints Synergistically Enhance Neural PDE Surrogates
Yunfei Huang, David S. Greenberg
Abstract
Neural PDE surrogates can improve the costaccuracy tradeoff of classical solvers, but often generalize poorly to new initial conditions and accumulate errors over time. Physical and symmetry constraints have shown promise in closing this performance gap, but existing techniques for imposing these inductive biases are incompatible with the staggered grids commonly used in computational fluid dynamics. Here we introduce novel input and output layers that respect physical laws and symmetries on the staggered grids, and for the first time systematically investigate how these constraints, individually and in combination, affect the accuracy of PDE surrogates. We focus on two challenging problems: shallow water equations with closed boundaries and decaying incompressible turbulence. Compared to strong baselines, symmetries and physical constraints consistently improve performance across tasks, architectures, autoregressive prediction steps, accuracy measures, and network sizes. Symmetries are more effective than physical constraints, but surrogates with both performed best, even compared to baselines with data augmentation or pushforward training, while themselves benefiting from the pushforward trick. Doublyconstrained surrogates also generalize better to initial conditions and durations beyond the range of the training data, and more accurately predict real-world ocean currents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c2fd8a7d-2023-4e15-b77b-8993a5e7dc91Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on25
- Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola Borislavov Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 3,911 citations
- Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph NetworksAlvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying et al.ICML 2020 · 1,439 citations
- Directional Message Passing for Molecular GraphsJohannes Klicpera, Janek Groß, Stephan GünnemannICLR 2020 · 1,079 citations
- ClimaX: A foundation model for weather and climateTung Nguyen, Johannes Brandstetter, Ashish Kapoor, Jayesh K. Gupta et al.ICML 2023 · 426 citations
- Message Passing Neural PDE SolversJohannes Brandstetter, Daniel E. Worrall, Max WellingICLR 2022 · 410 citations
Related papers
- Incorporating Symmetry into Deep Dynamics Models for Improved GeneralizationRui Wang, Robin Walters, Rose YuICLR 2021 · 201 citations
- NeuralStagger: Accelerating Physics-constrained Neural PDE Solver with Spatial-temporal DecompositionXinquan Huang, Wenlei Shi, Qi Meng, Yue Wang et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
- Scaling physics-informed hard constraints with mixture-of-expertsNithin Chalapathi, Yiheng Du, Aditi S. KrishnapriyanICLR 2024 · 29 citations
- Approximately Equivariant Networks for Imperfectly Symmetric DynamicsRui Wang, Robin Walters, Rose YuICML 2022 · 111 citations
- Guaranteed Conservation of Momentum for Learning Particle-based Fluid DynamicsLukas Prantl, Benjamin Ummenhofer, Vladlen Koltun, Nils ThuereyNeurIPS 2022 · 54 citations
