Deep Latent Graph Matching
Tianshu Yu, Runzhong Wang, Junchi Yan, Baoxin Li
Abstract
Deep learning for graph matching (GM) has emerged as an important research topic due to its superior performance over traditional methods and insights it provides for solving other combinatorial problems on graph. While recent deep methods for GM extensively investigated effective node/edge feature learning or downstream GM solvers given such learned features, there is little existing work questioning if the fixed connectivity/topology typically constructed using heuristics (e.g., Delaunay or k-nearest) is indeed suitable for GM. From a learning perspective, we argue that the fixed topology may restrict the model capacity and thus potentially hinder the performance. To address this, we propose to learn the (distribution of) latent topology, which can better support the downstream GM task. We devise two latent graph generation procedures, one deterministic and one generative. Particularly, the generative procedure emphasizes the across-graph consistency and thus can be viewed as a matching-guided co-generative model. Our methods deliver superior performance over previous state-of-the-arts on public benchmarks, hence supporting our hypothesis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c2ea2878-4bc6-4444-a8b6-755695018a91Cited by top-tier papers11
- Interpretable Neural Subgraph Matching for Graph RetrievalIndradyumna Roy, Venkata Sai Baba Reddy Velugoti, Soumen Chakrabarti, Abir DeAAAI 2022 · 51 citations
- Graph Matching with Bi-level Noisy CorrespondenceYijie Lin, Mouxing Yang, Jun Yu, Peng Hu et al.ICCV 2023 · 45 citations
- Maximum Common Subgraph Guided Graph Retrieval: Late and Early Interaction NetworksIndradyumna Roy, Soumen Chakrabarti, Abir DeNeurIPS 2022 · 12 citations
- Appearance and Structure Aware Robust Deep Visual Graph Matching: Attack, Defense and BeyondQibing Ren, Qingquan Bao, Runzhong Wang, Junchi YanCVPR 2022 · 10 citations
- Video Action Segmentation via Contextually Refined Temporal KeypointsBorui Jiang, Yang Jin, Zhentao Tan, Yadong MuICCV 2023 · 9 citations
Builds on5
- Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial SolversMarin Vlastelica Pogancic, Anselm Paulus, Vít Musil, Georg Martius et al.ICLR 2020 · 341 citations
- Learning Combinatorial Embedding Networks for Deep Graph MatchingRunzhong Wang, Junchi Yan, Xiaokang YangICCV 2019 · 268 citations
- Deep Graph Matching ConsensusMatthias Fey, Jan Eric Lenssen, Christopher Morris, Jonathan Masci et al.ICLR 2020 · 227 citations
- Learning deep graph matching with channel-independent embedding and Hungarian attentionTianshu Yu, Runzhong Wang, Junchi Yan, Baoxin LiICLR 2020 · 113 citations
- Deep Graphical Feature Learning for the Feature Matching ProblemZhen Zhang, Wee Sun LeeICCV 2019 · 67 citations
Related papers
- IA-GM: A Deep Bidirectional Learning Method for Graph MatchingKaixuan Zhao, Shikui Tu, Lei XuAAAI 2021 · 13 citations
- Discrete Cycle-Consistency Based Unsupervised Deep Graph MatchingSiddharth Tourani, Muhammad Haris Khan, Carsten Rother, Bogdan SavchynskyyAAAI 2024 · 5 citations
- GAMnet: Robust Feature Matching via Graph Adversarial-Matching NetworkBo Jiang, Pengfei Sun, Ziyan Zhang, Jin Tang et al.ACM MM 2021 · 8 citations
- Universe Points Representation Learning for Partial Multi-Graph MatchingZhakshylyk Nurlanov, Frank R. Schmidt, Florian BernardAAAI 2023 · 6 citations
- Learning Combinatorial Solver for Graph MatchingTao Wang, He Liu, Yidong Li, Yi Jin et al.CVPR 2020
