USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
GradEscape: A Gradient-Based Evader Against AI-Generated Text Detectors
Wenlong Meng, Shuguo Fan, Chengkun Wei, Min Chen, Yuwei Li, Yuanchao Zhang, Zhikun Zhang, Wenzhi Chen
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce GradEscape, the first gradient-based evader designed to attack AI-generated text (AIGT) detectors. GradEscape overcomes the undifferentiable computation problem, caused by the discrete nature of text, by introducing a novel approach to construct weighted embeddings for the detector input. It then updates the evader model parameters using feedback from victim detectors, achieving high attack success with minimal text modification. To address the issue of tokenizer mismatch between the evader and the detector, we introduce a warm-started evader method, enabling GradEscape to adapt to detectors across any language model architecture. Moreover, we employ novel tokenizer inference and model extraction techniques, facilitating effective evasion even in query-only access. We evaluate GradEscape on four datasets and three widely-used language models, benchmarking it against four state-of-the-art AIGT evaders. Experimental results demonstrate that GradEscape outperforms existing evaders in various scenarios, including with an 11B paraphrase model, while utilizing only 139M parameters. We have successfully applied GradEscape to two real-world commercial AIGT detectors. Our analysis reveals that the primary vulnerability stems from disparity in text expression styles within the training data. We also propose a potential defense strategy to mitigate the threat of AIGT evaders. We open-source our GradEscape for developing more robust AIGT detectors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c2a0f93b-c778-4e96-bcd6-cddf3abba63bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on37
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and EntailmentDi Jin, Zhijing Jin, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Peter SzolovitsAAAI 2020 · 1,333 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Paraphrasing: A Universal Attack for Humanizing AI-Generated TextYize Cheng, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Mehrdad Saberi, Shoumik Saha et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- TempParaphraser: "Heating Up" Text to Evade AI-Text Detection through ParaphrasingJunjie Huang, Ruiquan Zhang, Jinsong Su, Yidong ChenEMNLP 2025
- Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defenseKalpesh Krishna, Yixiao Song, Marzena Karpinska, John Wieting et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 657 citations
- Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay DetectionXinlin Peng, Ying Zhou, Ben He, Le Sun et al.EMNLP 2023 · 9 citations
- ICL-Evader: Zero-Query Black-Box Evasion Attacks on In-Context Learning and Their DefensesNingyuan He, Ronghong Huang, Qianqian Tang, Hongyu Wang et al.WWW 2026
