How Does Data Augmentation Affect Privacy in Machine Learning?
Da Yu, Huishuai Zhang, Wei Chen, Jian Yin, Tie-Yan Liu
Abstract
It is observed in the literature that data augmentation can significantly mitigate membership inference (MI) attack. However, in this work, we challenge this observation by proposing new MI attacks to utilize the information of augmented data. MI attack is widely used to measure the model's information leakage of the training set. We establish the optimal membership inference when the model is trained with augmented data, which inspires us to formulate the MI attack as a set classification problem, i.e., classifying a set of augmented instances instead of a single data point, and design input permutation invariant features. Empirically, we demonstrate that the proposed approach universally outperforms original methods when the model is trained with data augmentation. Even further, we show that the proposed approach can achieve higher MI attack success rates on models trained with some data augmentation than the existing methods on models trained without data augmentation. Notably, we achieve a 70.1% MI attack success rate on CIFAR10 against a wide residual network while the previous best approach only attains 61.9%. This suggests the privacy risk of models trained with data augmentation could be largely underestimated.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c26e0d5f-b7e9-442d-964c-4f3945e02ee3Cited by top-tier papers10
- Privacy for Free: How does Dataset Condensation Help Privacy?Tian Dong, Bo Zhao, Lingjuan LyuICML 2022 · 154 citations
- Do not Let Privacy Overbill Utility: Gradient Embedding Perturbation for Private LearningDa Yu, Huishuai Zhang, Wei Chen, Tie-Yan LiuICLR 2021 · 133 citations
- Large Scale Private Learning via Low-rank ReparametrizationDa Yu, Huishuai Zhang, Wei Chen, Jian Yin et al.ICML 2021 · 122 citations
- Boosting Adversarial Transferability by Achieving Flat Local MaximaZhijin Ge, Xiaosen Wang, Hongying Liu, Fanhua Shang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 112 citations
- Self-Supervised Learning with Kernel Dependence MaximizationYazhe Li, Roman Pogodin, Danica J. Sutherland, Arthur GrettonNeurIPS 2021 · 107 citations
Builds on7
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep LearningBriland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, Fernando Pérez-CruzCCS 2017 · 1,581 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
- Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial RegularizationMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrCCS 2018 · 543 citations
- MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial ExamplesJinyuan Jia, Ahmed Salem, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang et al.CCS 2019 · 464 citations
Related papers
- When Does Data Augmentation Help With Membership Inference Attacks?Yigitcan Kaya, Tudor DumitrasICML 2021 · 82 citations
- Label-Only Membership Inference AttacksChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Florian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas PapernotICML 2021 · 628 citations
- Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference AttacksSajjad Zarifzadeh, Philippe Liu, Reza ShokriICML 2024 · 92 citations
- Re-Thinking Model Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural NetworksNgoc-Bao Nguyen, Keshigeyan Chandrasegaran, Milad Abdollahzadeh, Ngai-Man CheungCVPR 2023
- MIST: Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks Through Membership-Invariant Subspace TrainingJiacheng Li, Ninghui Li, Bruno RibeiroUSENIX Security 2024 · 16 citations
