Personalizing LLMs with Binary Feedback: A Preference-Calibrated Optimization Framework
Xilai Ma, Liye Zhao, Weijun Yao, Haibing Di, Wenya Wang, Jing Li
Abstract
Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences. Existing methods often focus on isolated user histories, neglecting the essential role of inter-user differences. We propose C-BPO, a framework that personalizes LLMs via preference-calibrated binary signals. By treating target user data as positive feedback and other users' data as an auxiliary set of implicit negative signals, C-BPO captures distinct inter-user differences. To mitigate the preference overlap issue, where shared task knowledge is erroneously penalized, we derive an objective grounded in Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning theory. This approach purifies negative signals by subtracting "positive bias", ensuring alignment with unique idiosyncrasies without compromising general helpfulness. Empirical experiments across various personalization tasks and backbone LLMs show C-BPO consistently outperforms baselines, demonstrating the efficacy of preference-calibrated binary signals in modeling inter-user differences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c1e50a0f-10e9-423e-861f-30f4a22a2e6bBuilds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMsJiongnan Liu, Yutao Zhu, Shuting Wang, Xiaochi Wei et al.ACL 2025 · 19 citations
- Class Prior Estimation with Biased Positives and Unlabeled ExamplesShantanu Jain, Justin Delano, Himanshu Sharma, Predrag RadivojacAAAI 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMsYoungbin Choi, Seunghyuk Cho, Minjong Lee, MoonJeong Park et al.EMNLP 2025
- What Makes LLMs Effective Sequential Recommenders? A Study on Preference Intensity and Temporal ContextZhongyu Ouyang, Qianlong Wen, Chunhui Zhang, Yanfang Ye et al.ACL 2026
- Bootstrapping LLMs via Preference-Based Policy OptimizationChen JiaAAAI 2026
- Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Huaisheng Zhu, Mingxiao Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 76 citations
- NextQuill: Causal Preference Modeling for Enhancing LLM PersonalizationXiaoyan Zhao, Juntao You, Yang Zhang, Wenjie Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 38 citations
