GREAT Score: Global Robustness Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbation using Generative Models
Zaitang Li, Pin-Yu Chen, Tsung-Yi Ho
Abstract
Current studies on adversarial robustness mainly focus on aggregating local robustness results from a set of data samples to evaluate and rank different models. However, the local statistics may not well represent the true global robustness of the underlying unknown data distribution. To address this challenge, this paper makes the first attempt to present a new framework, called GREAT Score , for global robustness evaluation of adversarial perturbation using generative models. Formally, GREAT Score carries the physical meaning of a global statistic capturing a mean certified attack-proof perturbation level over all samples drawn from a generative model. For finite-sample evaluation, we also derive a probabilistic guarantee on the sample complexity and the difference between the sample mean and the true mean. GREAT Score has several advantages: (1) Robustness evaluations using GREAT Score are efficient and scalable to large models, by sparing the need of running adversarial attacks. In particular, we show high correlation and significantly reduced computation cost of GREAT Score when compared to the attack-based model ranking on RobustBench (Croce,et. al. 2021). (2) The use of generative models facilitates the approximation of the unknown data distribution. In our ablation study with different generative adversarial networks (GANs), we observe consistency between global robustness evaluation and the quality of GANs. (3) GREAT Score can be used for remote auditing of privacy-sensitive black-box models, as demonstrated by our robustness evaluation on several online facial recognition services.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c1a463f5-d501-4bde-ad40-cc9e6c9db1a3Builds on17
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICCV 2019 · 5,843 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
Related papers
- Scalable Quantitative Verification For Deep Neural NetworksTeodora Baluta, Zheng Leong Chua, Kuldeep S. Meel, Prateek SaxenaICSE 2021 · 39 citations
- Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) DefinitionTianyu Pang, Min Lin, Xiao Yang, Jun Zhu et al.ICML 2022 · 168 citations
- A Framework for robustness Certification of Smoothed Classifiers using F-DivergencesKrishnamurthy (Dj) Dvijotham, Jamie Hayes, Borja Balle, J. Zico Kolter et al.ICLR 2020 · 74 citations
- DRF: Improving Certified Robustness via Distributional Robustness FrameworkZekai Wang, Zhengyu Zhou, Weiwei LiuAAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- Improving Transferability of Adversarial Patches on Face Recognition With Generative ModelsZihao Xiao, Xianfeng Gao, Chilin Fu, Yinpeng Dong et al.CVPR 2021
