Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics
Mingrui Zhang, Jianhong Wang, James B. Tlhomole, Matthew D. Piggott
Abstract
Extracting information on fluid motion directly from images is challenging. Fluid flow represents a complex dynamic system governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. General optical flow methods are typically designed for rigid body motion, and thus struggle if applied to fluid motion estimation directly. Further, optical flow methods only focus on two consecutive frames without utilising historical temporal information, while the fluid motion (velocity field) can be considered a continuous trajectory constrained by timedependent partial differential equations (PDEs). This discrepancy has the potential to induce physically inconsistent estimations. Here we propose an unsupervised learning based predictioncorrection scheme for fluid flow estimation. An estimate is first given by a PDE-constrained optical flow predictor, which is then refined by a physical based corrector. The proposed approach outperforms optical flow methods and shows competitive results compared to existing supervised learning based methods on a benchmark dataset. Furthermore, the proposed approach can generalize to complex real-world fluid scenarios where ground truth information is effectively unknowable. Finally, experiments demonstrate that the physical corrector can refine flow estimates by mimicking the operator splitting method commonly utilised in fluid dynamical simulation. * Warping CNN Φ(𝑢 !"# , % 𝑢 ! ) " 𝑢 ! Vorticity 𝜔 !"# 𝜔 ! Temporal Consistency Loss 𝑢 ! Vorticity
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c199879a-cbe6-402b-b6bb-c693ea9a06d7Cited by top-tier papers4
- HelmFluid: Learning Helmholtz Dynamics for Interpretable Fluid PredictionLanxiang Xing, Haixu Wu, Yuezhou Ma, Jianmin Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Learning Vortex Dynamics for Fluid Inference and PredictionYitong Deng, Hong-Xing Yu, Jiajun Wu, Bo ZhuICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- PIVNO: Particle Image Velocimetry Neural OperatorXu Jie, Xuesong Zhang, Jing Jiang, Qinghua CuiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Discretization-invariance? On the Discretization Mismatch Errors in Neural OperatorsWenhan Gao, Ruichen Xu, Yuefan Deng, Yi LiuICLR 2025
Builds on4
- Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph NetworksAlvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying et al.ICML 2020 · 1,439 citations
- Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph NetworksTobias Pfaff, Meire Fortunato, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter W. BattagliaICLR 2021 · 1,175 citations
- Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-SolversKiwon Um, Robert Brand, Yun (Raymond) Fei, Philipp Holl et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 398 citations
- Combining Differentiable PDE Solvers and Graph Neural Networks for Fluid Flow PredictionFilipe de Avila Belbute-Peres, Thomas D. Economon, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 271 citations
Related papers
- Learning Incompressible Fluid Dynamics from Scratch - Towards Fast, Differentiable Fluid Models that GeneralizeNils Wandel, Michael Weinmann, Reinhard KleinICLR 2021 · 82 citations
- Dynamic Fluid Surface Reconstruction Using Deep Neural NetworkSimron Thapa, Nianyi Li, Jinwei YeCVPR 2020
- Unsupervised Learning of Full-Waveform Inversion: Connecting CNN and Partial Differential Equation in a LoopPeng Jin, Xitong Zhang, Yinpeng Chen, Sharon Xiaolei Huang et al.ICLR 2022 · 63 citations
- Spline-PINN: Approaching PDEs without Data Using Fast, Physics-Informed Hermite-Spline CNNsNils Wandel, Michael Weinmann, Michael Neidlin, Reinhard KleinAAAI 2022 · 82 citations
- Learning an Implicit Physics Model for Image-Based Fluid SimulationEmily Yue-Ting Jia, Jiageng Mao, Zhiyuan Gao, Yajie Zhao et al.ICCV 2025
