Self-Refining Vision Language Model for Robotic Failure Detection and Reasoning
Carl Qi, Xiaojie Wang, Silong Yong, Stephen Sheng, Huitan Mao, sriram srinivasan, Manikantan Nambi, Amy Zhang, Yesh Dattatreya
Abstract
Reasoning about failures is crucial for building reliable and trustworthy robotic systems. Prior approaches either treat failure reasoning as a closed-set classification problem or assume access to ample human annotations. Failures in the real world are typically subtle, combinatorial, and difficult to enumerate, whereas rich reasoning labels are expensive to acquire. We address this problem by introducing ARMOR: Adaptive Round-based Multi-task mOdel for Robotic failure detection and reasoning. We formulate detection and reasoning as a multi-task self-refinement process, where the model iteratively predicts detection outcomes and natural language reasoning conditioned on past outputs. During training, ARMOR learns from heterogeneous supervision - large-scale sparse binary labels and small-scale rich reasoning annotations - optimized via a combination of offline and online imitation learning. At inference time, ARMOR generates multiple refinement trajectories and selects the most confident prediction via a self-certainty metric. Experiments across diverse environments show that ARMOR achieves state-of-the-art performance by improving over the previous approaches by up to 30% on failure detection rate and up to 100% in reasoning measured through LLM fuzzy match score, demonstrating robustness to heterogeneous supervision and open-ended reasoning beyond predefined failure modes. We provide dditional visualizations on our website: https://sites.google.com/utexas.edu/armor.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c13aa3a7-9856-48b8-9d00-36e7a6a086eaBuilds on22
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
Related papers
- RoboFailRing: Retrieval-Augmented and Language Grounding Failure Detection for VLM-enabled Robotic ManipulationChenduo Ying, Linkang Du, Yuanchao Shu, Peng ChengACL 2026
- AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic ManipulationJiafei Duan, Wilbert Pumacay, Nishanth Kumar, Yi Ru Wang et al.ICLR 2025 · 4 citations
- NeurVLA: Unleashing Failure-Handling Capability of Vision-Language-Action Models via Neural-Symbolic ReasoningXuqi Liu, Minghe Gao, Juncheng Li, Siliang TangICML 2026
- Cultivating Forensic Reasoning for Generalizable Multimodal Manipulation DetectionYuchen Zhang, Yaxiong Wang, Kecheng Han, Yujiao Wu et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- ARMOR: Aligning Secure and Safe Large Language Models via Meticulous ReasoningZhengyue Zhao, Yingzi Ma, Somesh Jha, Marco Pavone et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
