Provable Scaling Laws for the Test-Time Compute of Large Language Models
Yanxi Chen, Xuchen Pan, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding, Jingren Zhou
Abstract
We propose two simple, principled and practical algorithms that enjoy provable scaling laws for the test-time compute of large language models (LLMs). The first one is a two-stage knockout-style algorithm: given an input problem, it first generates multiple candidate solutions, and then aggregate them via a knockout tournament for the final output. Assuming that the LLM can generate a correct solution with non-zero probability and do better than a random guess in comparing a pair of correct and incorrect solutions, we prove theoretically that the failure probability of this algorithm decays to zero exponentially or by a power law (depending on the specific way of scaling) as its test-time compute grows. The second one is a two-stage league-style algorithm, where each candidate is evaluated by its average win rate against multiple opponents, rather than eliminated upon loss to a single opponent. Under analogous but more robust assumptions, we prove that its failure probability also decays to zero exponentially with more test-time compute. Both algorithms require a black-box LLM and nothing else (e.g., no verifier or reward model) for a minimalistic implementation, which makes them appealing for practical applications and easy to adapt for different tasks. Through extensive experiments with diverse models and datasets, we validate the proposed theories and demonstrate the outstanding scaling properties of both algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c13a751a-c3cf-4143-8e55-8c4b92d08e02Cited by top-tier papers2
- Accurate Table Question Answering with Accessible LLMsYangfan Jiang, Fei Wei, Ergute Bao, Yaliang Li et al.ICDE 2026 · 1 citation
- Large Language Models Explore by Latent DistillingYuanhao Zeng, Ao Lu, Lufei Li, Zheng Zhang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
Related papers
- Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally Can be More Effective than Scaling Parameters for ReasoningCharlie Victor Snell, Jaehoon Lee, Kelvin Xu, Aviral KumarICLR 2025
- Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token PredictionLunjun Zhang, Arian Hosseini, Hritik Bansal, Mehran Kazemi et al.ICLR 2025
- Optimal Aggregation of LLM and PRM Signals for Efficient Test-Time ScalingPeng Kuang, Yanli Wang, Xiaoyu Han, Yaowenqi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- ROC-n-reroll: How verifier imperfection affects test-time scalingFlorian E. Dorner, Yatong Chen, André F Cruz, Fanny YangICLR 2026 · 13 citations
