Latent Variable Modelling with Hyperbolic Normalizing Flows
Avishek Joey Bose, Ariella Smofsky, Renjie Liao, Prakash Panangaden, William L. Hamilton
Abstract
The choice of approximate posterior distributions plays a central role in stochastic variational inference (SVI). One effective solution is the use of normalizing flows defined on Euclidean spaces to construct flexible posterior distributions. However, one key limitation of existing normalizing flows is that they are restricted to the Euclidean space and are ill-equipped to model data with an underlying hierarchical structure. To address this fundamental limitation, we present the first extension of normalizing flows to hyperbolic spaces. We first elevate normalizing flows to hyperbolic spaces using coupling transforms defined on the tangent bundle, termed Tangent Coupling (). We further introduce Wrapped Hyperboloid Coupling (), a fully invertible and learnable transformation that explicitly utilizes the geometric structure of hyperbolic spaces, allowing for expressive posteriors while being efficient to sample from. We demonstrate the efficacy of our novel normalizing flow over hyperbolic VAEs and Euclidean normalizing flows. Our approach achieves improved performance on density estimation, as well as reconstruction of real-world graph data, which exhibit a hierarchical structure. Finally, we show that our approach can be used to power a generative model over hierarchical data using hyperbolic latent variables.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c11bc1d1-0722-4c6d-ada3-4abc5dfef969Cited by top-tier papers32
- Riemannian Score-Based Generative ModellingValentin De Bortoli, Emile Mathieu, Michael J. Hutchinson, James Thornton et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 306 citations
- Riemannian Continuous Normalizing FlowsEmile Mathieu, Maximilian NickelNeurIPS 2020 · 198 citations
- Flow Matching on General GeometriesRicky T. Q. Chen, Yaron LipmanICLR 2024 · 193 citations
- Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimationJohann Brehmer, Kyle CranmerNeurIPS 2020 · 187 citations
- Riemannian Diffusion ModelsChin-Wei Huang, Milad Aghajohari, Joey Bose, Prakash Panangaden et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 154 citations
Builds on5
- Hyperbolic Neural Networks++Ryohei Shimizu, Yusuke Mukuta, Tatsuya HaradaICLR 2021 · 791 citations
- Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimationJohann Brehmer, Kyle CranmerNeurIPS 2020 · 187 citations
- Normalizing Flows on Tori and SpheresDanilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, Sébastien Racanière, Michael S. Albergo et al.ICML 2020 · 181 citations
- Mixed-curvature Variational AutoencodersOndrej Skopek, Octavian-Eugen Ganea, Gary BécigneulICLR 2020 · 122 citations
- Hyperbolic Image EmbeddingsValentin Khrulkov, Leyla Mirvakhabova, Evgeniya Ustinova, Ivan V. Oseledets et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Delving into Discrete Normalizing Flows on SO(3) Manifold for Probabilistic Rotation ModelingYulin Liu, Haoran Liu, Yingda Yin, Yang Wang et al.CVPR 2023
- GGBall: Graph Generative Model on Poincaré BallTianci Bu, Chuanrui Wang, Hao Ma, Haoren Zheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Improved Variational Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference with Normalizing FlowsCheng ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 32 citations
- Tractable Density Estimation on Learned Manifolds with Conformal Embedding FlowsBrendan Leigh Ross, Jesse C. CresswellNeurIPS 2021 · 39 citations
- Embedded-model flows: Combining the inductive biases of model-free deep learning and explicit probabilistic modelingGianluigi Silvestri, Emily Fertig, Dave Moore, Luca AmbrogioniICLR 2022 · 4 citations
