Towards On-Device Evidence Gathering for Intimate Partner Infiltration: A Feasibility Study for Joint Identity-Action Detection
Weisi Yang, Shinan Liu, Feng Xiao, Nick Feamster, Stephen Xia
Abstract
Intimate Partner Infiltration (IPI) refers to phone-side privacy infiltration in intimate or close relationships, often enabled by physical access to a person's smartphone and discussed in technology-facilitated Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) contexts. Unlike conventional cyberattackers, IPI perpetrators leverage proximity and personal knowledge to circumvent standard protection, underscoring the need for targeted interventions, motivating device-side tools that surface such risk evidence for later review. While prior works have extensively studied IPV, and some have provided tailored and effective solutions such as security clinics, they are necessarily episodic and human-expert-intensive, and offer limited automated visibility into what happens on a smartphone between support sessions. Guided by a formative interview with experts (n=5), we take the first exploration into gathering IPI-risk evidence from a mobile system perspective and present AID, Automated IPI Detection, a data-driven system that continuously logs unauthorized access and suspicious behaviors on smartphones. In a controlled 27-participant study, AID achieves an end-to-end F1 score of 0.928 with a 7.0% false positive rate for Top-1 phone-side risk flagging; when preserving top-3 candidate action categories as report context, AID achieves an F1 score of 0.981 and a false positive rate of 1.6%. These findings demonstrate AID's potential as an evidence-support tool that complements current clinic-based interpretation and safety-planning.
CCS Concepts: • Security and privacy → Social aspects of security and privacy; • Human-centered computing → Ubiquitous and mobile computing systems and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c07f2a7a-e339-4934-bb0f-f5799570346aBuilds on27
- Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion DetectionYisroel Mirsky, Tomer Doitshman, Yuval Elovici, Asaf ShabtaiNDSS 2018 · 945 citations
- SoK: Hate, Harassment, and the Changing Landscape of Online AbuseKurt Thomas, Devdatta Akhawe, Michael D. Bailey, Dan Boneh et al.S&P 2021 · 175 citations
- The Spyware Used in Intimate Partner ViolenceRahul Chatterjee, Periwinkle Doerfler, Hadas Orgad, Sam Havron et al.S&P 2018 · 167 citations
- 6thSense: A Context-aware Sensor-based Attack Detector for Smart DevicesAmit Kumar Sikder, Hidayet Aksu, A. Selcuk UluagacUSENIX Security 2017 · 129 citations
- Clinical Computer Security for Victims of Intimate Partner ViolenceSam Havron, Diana Freed, Rahul Chatterjee, Damon McCoy et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 118 citations
Related papers
- Care Infrastructures for Digital Security in Intimate Partner ViolenceEmily Tseng, Mehrnaz Sabet, Rosanna Bellini, Harkiran Kaur Sodhi et al.CHI 2022 · 77 citations
- Account Security Interfaces: Important, Unintuitive, and UntrustworthyAlaa Daffalla, Marina Sanusi Bohuk, Nicola Dell, Rosanna Bellini et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Abusability of Automation Apps in Intimate Partner ViolenceShirley Zhang, Paul Chung, Jacob Vervelde, Nishant Korapati et al.USENIX Security 2025
- The Digital-Safety Risks of Financial Technologies for Survivors of Intimate Partner ViolenceRosanna Bellini, Kevin Lee, Megan A. Brown, Jeremy Shaffer et al.USENIX Security 2023
- The Tools and Tactics Used in Intimate Partner Surveillance: An Analysis of Online Infidelity ForumsEmily Tseng, Rosanna Bellini, Nora McDonald, Matan Danos et al.USENIX Security 2020
