PrExMe! Large Scale Prompt Exploration of Open Source LLMs for Machine Translation and Summarization Evaluation
Christoph Leiter, Steffen Eger
Abstract
Large language models (LLMS) have revolutionized NLP research. Notably, in-context learning enables their use as evaluation metrics for natural language generation, making them particularly advantageous in low-resource scenarios and time-restricted applications. In this work, we introduce PrExMe, a large-scale Prompt Exploration for Metrics, where we evaluate more than 720 prompt templates for open-source LLM-based metrics on machine translation (MT) and summarization datasets, totalling over 6.6M evaluations. This extensive comparison ( 1 ) benchmarks recent open-source LLMS as metrics and (2) explores the stability and variability of different prompting strategies. We discover that, on the one hand, there are scenarios for which prompts are stable. For instance, some LLMS show idiosyncratic preferences and favor to grade generated texts with textual labels while others prefer to return numeric scores. On the other hand, the stability of prompts and model rankings can be susceptible to seemingly innocuous changes. For example, changing the requested output format from "0 to 100" to "-1 to +1" can strongly affect the rankings in our evaluation. Our study contributes to understanding the impact of different prompting approaches on LLM-based metrics for MT and summarization evaluation, highlighting the most stable prompting patterns and potential limitations. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c07ad46f-fa86-4a9d-851d-bd8b720d97cdCited by top-tier papers2
- ScImage: How good are multimodal large language models at scientific text-to-image generation?Leixin Zhang, Steffen Eger, Yinjie Cheng, Weihe Zhai et al.ICLR 2025
- Argument Summarization and its Evaluation in the Era of Large Language ModelsMoritz Altemeyer, Steffen Eger, Johannes Daxenberger, Yanran Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on9
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 citations
Related papers
- What do Large Language Models Need for Machine Translation Evaluation?Shenbin Qian, Archchana Sindhujan, Minnie Kabra, Diptesh Kanojia et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- From Jack of All Trades to Master of One: Specializing LLM-based Autoraters to a Test SetMara Finkelstein, Daniel Deutsch, Parker Riley, Juraj Juraska et al.ICML 2025
- Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMsSiyan Zhao, Mingyi Hong, Yang Liu, Devamanyu Hazarika et al.ICLR 2025
- Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMsFelipe Maia Polo, Ronald Xu, Lucas Weber, Mírian Silva et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 93 citations
- Persona-Augmented Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs Across Diverse Writing StylesKimberly Le Truong, Riccardo Fogliato, Hoda Heidari, Steven WuEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
