QUIC is not Quick Enough over Fast Internet
Xumiao Zhang, Shuowei Jin, Yi He, Ahmad Hassan, Z. Morley Mao, Feng Qian, Zhi-Li Zhang
Abstract
QUIC is expected to be a game-changer in improving web application performance. In this paper, we conduct a systematic examination of QUIC's performance over high-speed networks. We find that over fast Internet, the UDP+QUIC+HTTP/3 stack suffers a data rate reduction of up to 45.2% compared to the TCP+TLS+HTTP/2 counterpart. Moreover, the performance gap between QUIC and HTTP/2 grows as the underlying bandwidth increases. We observe this issue on lightweight data transfer clients and major web browsers (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Opera), on different hosts (desktop, mobile), and over diverse networks (wired broadband, cellular). It affects not only file transfers, but also various applications such as video streaming (up to 9.8% video bitrate reduction) and web browsing. Through rigorous packet trace analysis and kernel- and user-space profiling, we identify the root cause to be high receiver-side processing overhead, in particular, excessive data packets and QUIC's user-space ACKs. We make concrete recommendations for mitigating the observed performance issues.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c047b91a-cb18-4682-9d60-3823d3e395b0Cited by top-tier papers2
- Performant Synchronization in Geo-Distributed DatabasesDuling Xu, Tong Li, Zegang Sun, Zheng Chen et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 3 citations
- Designing Transport-Level Encryption for Datacenter NetworksTianyi Gao, Xinshu Ma, Suhas Narreddy, Eugenio Luo et al.S&P 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- A variegated look at 5G in the wild: performance, power, and QoE implicationsArvind Narayanan, Xumiao Zhang, Ruiyang Zhu, Ahmad Hassan et al.SIGCOMM 2021 · 259 citations
- XLINK: QoE-driven multi-path QUIC transport in large-scale video servicesZhilong Zheng, Yunfei Ma, Yanmei Liu, Furong Yang et al.SIGCOMM 2021 · 120 citations
- Dissecting Performance of Production QUICAlexander Yu, Theophilus A. BensonWWW 2021 · 59 citations
- CSI: inferring mobile ABR video adaptation behavior under HTTPS and QUICShichang Xu, Subhabrata Sen, Z. Morley MaoEuroSys 2020 · 25 citations
Related papers
- LiteQUIC: Improving QoE of Video Streams by Reducing CPU Overhead of QUICPengqiang Bi, Yifei Zou, Mengbai Xiao, Dongxiao Yu et al.ACM MM 2024 · 3 citations
- QCSD: A QUIC Client-Side Website-Fingerprinting Defence FrameworkJean-Pierre Smith, Luca Dolfi, Prateek Mittal, Adrian PerrigUSENIX Security 2022
- Breaking the Boundaries: Analyzing QUIC Frame-Packet Interactions With QUIC-AttackerNurullah Erinola, Marcel Maehren, Marcus Brinkmann, Jörg SchwenkUSENIX Security 2026
- QUICforge: Client-side Request Forgery in QUICKonrad Yuri Gbur, Florian TschorschNDSS 2023
- Themis: Toward Stable Near-Zero Queuing Delay in Congestion Control for Low-Latency Interactive Video StreamingFeida Liu, Yifan Wang, Jiaqi Zheng, Boxi Liu et al.ACM MM 2025
