Which Mutual-Information Representation Learning Objectives are Sufficient for Control?
Kate Rakelly, Abhishek Gupta, Carlos Florensa, Sergey Levine
Abstract
Mutual information maximization provides an appealing formalism for learning representations of data. In the context of reinforcement learning (RL), such representations can accelerate learning by discarding irrelevant and redundant information, while retaining the information necessary for control. Much of the prior work on these methods has addressed the practical difficulties of estimating mutual information from samples of high-dimensional observations, while comparatively less is understood about which mutual information objectives yield representations that are sufficient for RL from a theoretical perspective. In this paper, we formalize the sufficiency of a state representation for learning and representing the optimal policy, and study several popular mutual-information based objectives through this lens. Surprisingly, we find that two of these objectives can yield insufficient representations given mild and common assumptions on the structure of the MDP. We corroborate our theoretical results with empirical experiments on a simulated game environment with visual observations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers13
- Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement LearningBenjamin Eysenbach, Tianjun Zhang, Sergey Levine, Ruslan SalakhutdinovNeurIPS 2022 · 331 citations
- TACO: Temporal Latent Action-Driven Contrastive Loss for Visual Reinforcement LearningRuijie Zheng, Xiyao Wang, Yanchao Sun, Shuang Ma et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 89 citations
- Bridging State and History Representations: Understanding Self-Predictive RLTianwei Ni, Benjamin Eysenbach, Erfan Seyedsalehi, Michel Ma et al.ICLR 2024 · 50 citations
- Information Prioritization through Empowerment in Visual Model-based RLHomanga Bharadhwaj, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Dumitru Erhan, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 35 citations
- Learn what matters: cross-domain imitation learning with task-relevant embeddingsTim Franzmeyer, Philip H. S. Torr, João F. HenriquesNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
Builds on9
- CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement LearningMichael Laskin, Aravind Srinivas, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 1,261 citations
- Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable ModelAlex X. Lee, Anusha Nagabandi, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive RepresentationsMax Schwarzer, Ankesh Anand, Rishab Goel, R. Devon Hjelm et al.ICLR 2021 · 399 citations
- Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement LearningAdam Stooke, Kimin Lee, Pieter Abbeel, Michael LaskinICML 2021 · 389 citations
- Contrastive Learning of Structured World ModelsThomas N. Kipf, Elise van der Pol, Max WellingICLR 2020 · 322 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Perceive the World Through Control: Empowerment-Based Representation LearningMahsa Bastankhah, Sophie Broderick, Benjamin EysenbachICML 2026
- Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without ReconstructionAmy Zhang, Rowan Thomas McAllister, Roberto Calandra, Yarin Gal et al.ICLR 2021 · 77 citations
- Action-Sufficient Goal RepresentationsJinu Hyeon, Woobin Park, Hongjoon Ahn, Taesup MoonICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Action-Sufficient State Representation Learning for Control with Structural ConstraintsBiwei Huang, Chaochao Lu, Liu Leqi, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato et al.ICML 2022 · 41 citations
- Variational Empowerment as Representation Learning for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement LearningJongwook Choi, Archit Sharma, Honglak Lee, Sergey Levine et al.ICML 2021 · 41 citations
