Invariant Information Bottleneck for Domain Generalization
Bo Li, Yifei Shen, Yezhen Wang, Wenzhen Zhu, Colorado Reed, Dongsheng Li, Kurt Keutzer, Han Zhao
Abstract
Invariant risk minimization (IRM) has recently emerged as a promising alternative for domain generalization. Nevertheless, the loss function is difficult to optimize for nonlinear classifiers and the original optimization objective could fail when pseudo-invariant features and geometric skews exist. Inspired by IRM, in this paper we propose a novel formulation for domain generalization, dubbed invariant information bottleneck (IIB). IIB aims at minimizing invariant risks for nonlinear classifiers and simultaneously mitigating the impact of pseudo-invariant features and geometric skews. Specifically, we first present a novel formulation for invariant causal prediction via mutual information. Then we adopt the variational formulation of the mutual information to develop a tractable loss function for nonlinear classifiers. To overcome the failure modes of IRM, we propose to minimize the mutual information between the inputs and the corresponding representations. IIB significantly outperforms IRM on synthetic datasets, where the pseudo-invariant features and geometric skews occur, showing the effectiveness of proposed formulation in overcoming failure modes of IRM. Furthermore, experiments on DomainBed show that IIB outperforms 13 baselines by 0.9% on average across 7 real datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bfd6cb50-dd69-4ca4-9630-1c80eeec1a28Cited by top-tier papers30
- How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?Kenji Kawaguchi, Zhun Deng, Xu Ji, Jiaoyang HuangICML 2023 · 117 citations
- Optimal Representations for Covariate ShiftYangjun Ruan, Yann Dubois, Chris J. MaddisonICLR 2022 · 77 citations
- Beyond Normal: On the Evaluation of Mutual Information EstimatorsPawel Czyz, Frederic Grabowski, Julia E. Vogt, Niko Beerenwinkel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 72 citations
- FRAug: Tackling Federated Learning with Non-IID Features via Representation AugmentationHaokun Chen, Ahmed Frikha, Denis Krompass, Jindong Gu et al.ICCV 2023 · 44 citations
- DNA: Domain Generalization with Diversified Neural AveragingXu Chu, Yujie Jin, Wenwu Zhu, Yasha Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 41 citations
Builds on11
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)David Krueger, Ethan Caballero, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Amy Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 1,163 citations
- Domain Randomization and Pyramid Consistency: Simulation-to-Real Generalization Without Accessing Target Domain DataXiangyu Yue, Yang Zhang, Sicheng Zhao, Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli et al.ICCV 2019 · 462 citations
- Domain Generalization using Causal MatchingDivyat Mahajan, Shruti Tople, Amit SharmaICML 2021 · 399 citations
- Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationKartik Ahuja, Ethan Caballero, Dinghuai Zhang, Jean-Christophe Gagnon-Audet et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 372 citations
- The Risks of Invariant Risk MinimizationElan Rosenfeld, Pradeep Kumar Ravikumar, Andrej RisteskiICLR 2021 · 356 citations
Related papers
- Bayesian Invariant Risk MinimizationYong Lin, Hanze Dong, Hao Wang, Tong ZhangCVPR 2022 · 48 citations
- On the Connection between Invariant Learning and Adversarial Training for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationShiji Xin, Yifei Wang, Jingtong Su, Yisen WangAAAI 2023 · 14 citations
- Sparse Invariant Risk MinimizationXiao Zhou, Yong Lin, Weizhong Zhang, Tong ZhangICML 2022 · 85 citations
- Unsupervised Representation Learning - an Invariant Risk Minimization PerspectiveYotam Norman, Ron MeirICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Geometric Rate–Distortion Invariance for Domain GeneralizationTong Liu, Sen Liang, Shuo BaiICML 2026
