Where do Models go Wrong? Parameter-Space Saliency Maps for Explainability
Roman Levin, Manli Shu, Eitan Borgnia, Furong Huang, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein
Abstract
Conventional saliency maps highlight input features to which neural network predictions are highly sensitive. We take a different approach to saliency, in which we identify and analyze the network parameters, rather than inputs, which are responsible for erroneous decisions. We first verify that identified salient parameters are indeed responsible for misclassification by showing that turning these parameters off improves predictions on the associated samples, more than turning off the same number of random or least salient parameters. We further validate the link between salient parameters and network misclassification errors by observing that fine-tuning a small number of the most salient parameters on a single sample results in error correction on other samples which were misclassified for similar reasons -nearest neighbors in the saliency space. After validating our parameter-space saliency maps, we demonstrate that samples which cause similar parameters to malfunction are semantically similar. Further, we introduce an input-space saliency counterpart which reveals how image features cause specific network components to malfunction.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bf8bef87-0b4d-4859-ac61-c1d41cf86f12Builds on6
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural NetworksJungmin Kwon, Jeongseop Kim, Hyunseo Park, In Kwon ChoiICML 2021 · 385 citations
- Efficient Sharpness-aware Minimization for Improved Training of Neural NetworksJiawei Du, Hanshu Yan, Jiashi Feng, Joey Tianyi Zhou et al.ICLR 2022 · 168 citations
- Shared Interest: Measuring Human-AI Alignment to Identify Recurring Patterns in Model BehaviorAngie W. Boggust, Benjamin Hoover, Arvind Satyanarayan, Hendrik StrobeltCHI 2022 · 51 citations
Related papers
- Passive attention in artificial neural networks predicts human visual selectivityThomas A. Langlois, H. Charles Zhao, Erin Grant, Ishita Dasgupta et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 19 citations
- Valid P-Value for Deep Learning-driven Salient RegionDaiki Miwa, Vo Nguyen Le Duy, Ichiro TakeuchiICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- What Do You See?: Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Interpretability through Neural BackdoorsYi-Shan Lin, Wen-Chuan Lee, Z. Berkay CelikKDD 2021 · 62 citations
- Building Reliable Explanations of Unreliable Neural Networks: Locally Smoothing Perspective of Model InterpretationDohun Lim, Hyeonseok Lee, Sungchan KimCVPR 2021
- DANCE: Enhancing saliency maps using decoysYang Young Lu, Wenbo Guo, Xinyu Xing, William Stafford NobleICML 2021 · 14 citations
