A Topological Characterization of Modulo-p Arguments and Implications for Necklace Splitting
Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Alexandros Hollender, Katerina Sotiraki, Manolis Zampetakis
Abstract
The classes PPA-p have attracted attention lately, because they are the main candidates for capturing the complexity of Necklace Splitting with p thieves, for prime p. However, these classes were not known to have complete problems of a topological nature, which impedes any progress towards settling the complexity of the Necklace Splitting problem. On the contrary, topological problems have been pivotal in obtaining completeness results for PPAD and PPA, such as the PPAD-completeness of finding a Nash equilibrium [Daskalakis et al., 2009, Chen et al., 2009b] and the PPA-completeness of Necklace Splitting with 2 thieves [Filos-Ratsikas and Goldberg, 2019].
In this paper, we provide the first topological characterization of the classes PPA-p. First, we show that the computational problem associated with a simple generalization of Tucker's Lemma, termed p-polygon-Tucker, as well as the associated Borsuk-Ulam-type theorem, p-polygon-Borsuk-Ulam, are PPA-p-complete. Then, we show that the computational version of the well-known BSS Theorem [Bárány, Shlosman, and Szücs, 1981], as well as the associated BSS-Tucker problem are PPA-p-complete. Finally, using a different generalization of Tucker's Lemma (termed Z p -star-Tucker), which we prove to be PPA-p-complete, we prove that p-thief Necklace Splitting is in PPA-p. This latter result gives a new combinatorial proof for the Necklace Splitting theorem, the only proof of this nature other than that of Meunier [2014].
All of our containment results are obtained through a new combinatorial proof for Z pversions of Tucker's lemma that is a natural generalization of the standard combinatorial proof of Tucker's lemma by Freund and Todd [1981]. We believe that this new proof technique is of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bf5d94ec-7eab-4363-97a8-329c974f632dCited by top-tier papers5
- The complexity of constrained min-max optimizationConstantinos Daskalakis, Stratis Skoulakis, Manolis ZampetakisSTOC 2021 · 18 citations
- Pizza Sharing Is PPA-HardArgyrios Deligkas, John Fearnley, Themistoklis MelissourgosAAAI 2022 · 10 citations
- Constant inapproximability for PPAArgyrios Deligkas, John Fearnley, Alexandros Hollender, Themistoklis MelissourgosSTOC 2022 · 8 citations
- Hardness of Approximate Sperner and Applications to Envy-Free Cake CuttingRuiquan Gao, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad Rubinstein, Amin SaberiFOCS 2024
- Dueling over Dessert, Mastering the Art of Repeated Cake CuttingSimina Brânzei, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Reed C. Phillips, Suho Shin et al.NeurIPS 2024
Builds on1
Related papers
- High-to-Low Dimensional PPA-completeness: Borsuk-Ulam, Tucker, Consensus Halving, and Ham SandwichRuiquan Gao, Alexandros Hollender, Aviad RubinsteinFOCS 2025
- On Pigeonhole Principles and Ramsey in TFNPSiddhartha Jain, Jiawei Li, Robert Robere, Zhiyang XunFOCS 2024 · 2 citations
- Black-Box PPP Is Not Turing-ClosedNoah Fleming, Stefan Grosser, Toniann Pitassi, Robert RobereSTOC 2024 · 3 citations
- A topological proof of the Hell-Nešetřil dichotomySebastian Meyer, Jakub OprsalSODA 2025 · 2 citations
- Dichotomy for orderings?Gábor Kun, Jaroslav NesetrilSODA 2026 · 1 citation
