Crowdsourcing and Evaluating Concept-driven Explanations of Machine Learning Models
Swati Mishra, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski
Abstract
An important challenge in building explainable artificially intelligent (AI) systems is designing interpretable explanations. AI models often use low-level data features which may be hard for humans to interpret. Recent research suggests that situating machine decisions in abstract, human understandable concepts can help. However, it is challenging to determine the right level of conceptual mapping. In this research, we explore granularity (of data features) and context (of data instances) as dimensions underpinning conceptual mappings. Based on these measures, we explore strategies for designing explanations in classification models. We introduce an end-to-end concept elicitation pipeline that supports gathering high-level concepts for a given data set. Through crowd-sourced experiments, we examine how providing conceptual information shapes the effectiveness of explanations, finding that a balance between coarse and fine-grained explanations help users better estimate model predictions. We organize our findings into systematic themes that can inform design considerations for future systems.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in visualization; Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bf3abd66-8403-460d-ab96-3030bf8dc975Cited by top-tier papers4
- Towards Human-AI Deliberation: Design and Evaluation of LLM-Empowered Deliberative AI for AI-Assisted Decision-MakingShuai Ma, Qiaoyi Chen, Xinru Wang, Chengbo Zheng et al.CHI 2025 · 113 citations
- Perceptions of Sentient AI and Other Digital Minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) SurveyJacy Reese Anthis, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Ali Ladak, Aikaterina ManoliCHI 2025 · 24 citations
- Faulty or Ready? Handling Failures in Deep-Learning Computer Vision Models until Deployment: A Study of Practices, Challenges, and NeedsAgathe Balayn, Natasa Rikalo, Jie Yang, Alessandro BozzonCHI 2023 · 10 citations
- Query Design for Crowdsourced Clustering: Effect of Cognitive Overload and Contextual BiasYi Chen, Ramya Korlakai VinayakWWW 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on2
- Manipulating and Measuring Model InterpretabilityForough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CHI 2021 · 663 citations
- Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More GroundedRamprasaath Ramasamy Selvaraju, Stefan Lee, Yilin Shen, Hongxia Jin et al.ICCV 2019 · 288 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating the Impact of Human Explanation Strategies on Human-AI Visual Decision-MakingKatelyn Morrison, Donghoon Shin, Kenneth Holstein, Adam PererCSCW 2023 · 36 citations
- A Peek Into the Reasoning of Neural Networks: Interpreting With Structural Visual ConceptsYunhao Ge, Yao Xiao, Zhi Xu, Meng Zheng et al.CVPR 2021
- User Characteristics in Explainable AI: The Rabbit Hole of Personalization?Robert Nimmo, Marios Constantinides, Ke Zhou, Daniele Quercia et al.CHI 2024 · 29 citations
- ConceptExplainer: Interactive Explanation for Deep Neural Networks from a Concept PerspectiveJinbin Huang, Aditi Mishra, Bum Chul Kwon, Chris BryanIEEE VIS 2022 · 46 citations
- Designing Effective AI Explanations for Misinformation Detection: A Comparative Study of Content, Social, and Combined ExplanationsYeaeun Gong, Yifan Liu, Lanyu Shang, Na Wei et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
