Eyes Don't Lie: Subjective Hate Annotation and Detection with Gaze
Özge Alaçam, Sanne Hoeken, Sina Zarrieß
Abstract
Hate speech is a complex and subjective phenomenon. In this paper, we present a dataset (GAZE4HATE) that provides gaze data collected in a hate speech annotation experiment. We study whether the gaze of an annotator provides predictors of their subjective hatefulness rating, and how gaze features can improve Hate Speech Detection (HSD). We conduct experiments on statistical modeling of subjective hate ratings and gaze and analyze to what extent rationales derived from hate speech models correspond to human gaze and explanations in our data. Finally, we introduce MEANION, a first gaze-integrated HSD model. Our experiments show that particular gaze features like dwell time or fixation counts systematically correlate with annotators' subjective hate rating, and improve predictions of text-only hate speech models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bf2850a7-a658-4c3a-a008-5b0d202bb3f0Cited by top-tier papers2
- Hateful Word in Context ClassificationSanne Hoeken, Sina Zarrieß, Özge AlaçamEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Disentangling Subjectivity and Uncertainty for Hate Speech Annotation and Modeling using GazeÖzge Alaçam, Sanne Hoeken, Andreas Säuberli, Hannes Gröner et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on8
- Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate SpeechMai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi et al.EMNLP 2021 · 159 citations
- A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text ClassificationPepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma, Isabelle AugensteinEMNLP 2020 · 158 citations
- ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP ModelsJay DeYoung, Sarthak Jain, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Eric P. Lehman et al.ACL 2020 · 36 citations
- From the Detection of Toxic Spans in Online Discussions to the Analysis of Toxic-to-Civil TransferJohn Pavlopoulos, Léo Laugier, Alexandros Xenos, Jeffrey Sorensen et al.ACL 2022 · 35 citations
- When the Majority is Wrong: Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective TasksEve Fleisig, Rediet Abebe, Dan KleinEMNLP 2023 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Predict and Use: Harnessing Predicted Gaze to Improve Multimodal Sarcasm DetectionDivyank Tiwari, Diptesh Kanojia, Anupama Ray, Apoorva Nunna et al.EMNLP 2023 · 12 citations
- SAHSD: Enhancing Hate Speech Detection in LLM-Powered Web Applications via Sentiment Analysis and Few-Shot LearningYulong Wang, Hong Li, Ni WeiWWW 2025 · 2 citations
- Spanning the Spectrum of Hatred Detection: A Persian Multi-Label Hate Speech Dataset with Annotator RationalesZahra Delbari, Nafise Sadat Moosavi, Mohammad Taher PilehvarAAAI 2024 · 11 citations
- PersonaHate: A Scalable Persona-Based Data Synthesis Pipeline for Hate Speech AnalysisXinyu Zhang, Ziqing Yang, Michael Backes, Yang ZhangCCS 2026
- Hate Speech Detection Based on Sentiment Knowledge SharingXianbing Zhou, Yang Yong, Xiaochao Fan, Ge Ren et al.ACL 2021
