FewNLU: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Methods for Few-Shot Natural Language Understanding
Yanan Zheng, Jing Zhou, Yujie Qian, Ming Ding, Chonghua Liao, Li Jian, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Jie Tang, Sebastian Ruder, Zhilin Yang
Abstract
The few-shot natural language understanding (NLU) task has attracted much recent attention. However, prior methods have been evaluated under a disparate set of protocols, which hinders fair comparison and measuring the progress of the field. To address this issue, we introduce an evaluation framework that improves previous evaluation procedures in three key aspects, i.e., test performance, dev-test correlation, and stability. Under this new evaluation framework, we re-evaluate several state-of-the-art few-shot methods for NLU tasks. Our framework reveals new insights: (1) both the absolute performance and relative gap of the methods were not accurately estimated in prior literature; (2) no single method dominates most tasks with consistent performance; (3) improvements of some methods diminish with a larger pretrained model; and (4) gains from different methods are often complementary and the best combined model performs close to a strong fully-supervised baseline. We open-source our toolkit, FewNLU, that implements our evaluation framework along with a number of state-of-the-art methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bf185787-4f20-43ee-8b88-edb3e8773c3cCited by top-tier papers3
- FLEX: Unifying Evaluation for Few-Shot NLPJonathan Bragg, Arman Cohan, Kyle Lo, Iz BeltagyNeurIPS 2021 · 114 citations
- What are the best Systems? New Perspectives on NLP BenchmarkingPierre Colombo, Nathan Noiry, Ekhine Irurozki, Stéphan ClémençonNeurIPS 2022 · 20 citations
- Weaker Than You Think: A Critical Look at Weakly Supervised LearningDawei Zhu, Xiaoyu Shen, Marius Mosbach, Andreas Stephan et al.ACL 2023 · 13 citations
Builds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
- True Few-Shot Learning with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Douwe Kiela, Kyunghyun ChoNeurIPS 2021 · 547 citations
Related papers
- IGLUE: A Benchmark for Transfer Learning across Modalities, Tasks, and LanguagesEmanuele Bugliarello, Fangyu Liu, Jonas Pfeiffer, Siva Reddy et al.ICML 2022 · 71 citations
- Pre-trained Language Models Can be Fully Zero-Shot LearnersXuandong Zhao, Siqi Ouyang, Zhiguo Yu, Ming Wu et al.ACL 2023 · 22 citations
- Benchmarking Large Language Model Capabilities for Conditional GenerationJoshua Maynez, Priyanka Agrawal, Sebastian GehrmannACL 2023 · 6 citations
- InstructDial: Improving Zero and Few-shot Generalization in Dialogue through Instruction TuningPrakhar Gupta, Cathy Jiao, Yi-Ting Yeh, Shikib Mehri et al.EMNLP 2022 · 26 citations
- Tuning Language Models as Training Data Generators for Augmentation-Enhanced Few-Shot LearningYu Meng, Martin Michalski, Jiaxin Huang, Yu Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 64 citations
