SR-Scientist: Scientific Equation Discovery With Agentic AI
Shijie Xia, Yuhan Sun, Pengfei Liu
Abstract
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to scientific equation discovery, leveraging their embedded scientific knowledge for hypothesis generation. However, current methods typically confine LLMs to the role of an equation proposer within search algorithms like genetic programming. In this paper, we present SR-SCIENTIST, a framework that elevates the LLM from a simple equation proposer to an autonomous AI scientist that writes code to analyze data, implements the equation as code, submits it for evaluation, and optimizes the equation based on experimental feedback. Specifically, we wrap the code interpreter into a set of tools for data analysis and equation evaluation. The agent is instructed to optimize the equation by utilizing these tools over a long horizon with minimal human-defined pipelines. Empirical results show that SR-SCIENTIST outperforms baseline methods by an absolute margin of 6% to 35% on datasets covering four science disciplines. Additionally, we demonstrate our method's robustness to noise, the generalization of the discovered equations to out-of-domain data, and their symbolic accuracy. Furthermore, we develop an end-to-end reinforcement learning framework to enhance the agent's capabilities 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext befa72c0-c7c3-42a1-b6b3-8492c57adee7Cited by top-tier papers2
- NewtonBench: Benchmarking Generalizable Scientific Law Discovery in LLM AgentsTianshi Zheng, Kelvin Kiu Wai Tam, Newt Nguyen Kim Hue Nam, Baixuan Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 25 citations
- SciPredict: Can LLMs Predict the Outcomes of Scientific Experiments in Natural Sciences?Udari Sehwag, Elaine Lau, Haniyeh Oskouie, Shayan Shabihi et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on7
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
- End-to-end Symbolic Regression with TransformersPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, François ChartonNeurIPS 2022 · 320 citations
- Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesLuca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi et al.ICML 2021 · 251 citations
- A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic RegressionMikel Landajuela, Chak Shing Lee, Jiachen Yang, Ruben Glatt et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 160 citations
- Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept LibraryArya Grayeli, Atharva Sehgal, Omar Costilla-Reyes, Miles D. Cranmer et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 105 citations
Related papers
- LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language ModelsParshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Shashank Gupta, Amir Barati Farimani et al.ICLR 2025
- AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific InnovationJiabin Tang, Lianghao Xia, Zhonghang Li, Chao HuangNeurIPS 2025 · 101 citations
- LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific DiscoveryPingchuan Ma, Tsun-Hsuan Wang, Minghao Guo, Zhiqing Sun et al.ICML 2024 · 76 citations
- DecAEvolve: Decompose, Adapt, and Evolve for Effective LLM-based Scientific Equation DiscoveryPouya Behzadifar, Parshin Shojaee, Sanchit Kabra, Kazem Meidani et al.ICML 2026
- TusoAI: Agentic Optimization for Scientific MethodsAlistair Turcan, Kexin Huang, Lei Li, Martin J. ZhangICLR 2026 · 3 citations
