Far from the Shallow: Brain-Predictive Reasoning Embedding through Residual Disentanglement
Linyang He, Tianjun Zhong, Richard J. Antonello, Gavin Mischler, Micah Goldblum, Nima Mesgarani
Abstract
Understanding how the human brain progresses from processing simple linguistic inputs to performing high-level reasoning is a fundamental challenge in neuroscience. While modern large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to model neural responses to language, their internal representations are highly "entangled," mixing information about lexicon, syntax, meaning, and reasoning. This entanglement biases conventional brain encoding analyses toward linguistically shallow features (e.g., lexicon and syntax), making it difficult to isolate the neural substrates of cognitively deeper processes. Here, we introduce a residual disentanglement method that computationally isolates these components. By first probing an LM to identify feature-specific layers, our method iteratively regresses out lower-level representations to produce four nearly orthogonal embeddings for lexicon, syntax, meaning, and, critically, reasoning. We used these disentangled embeddings to model intracranial (ECoG) brain recordings from neurosurgical patients listening to natural speech. We show that: 1) This isolated reasoning embedding exhibits unique predictive power, accounting for variance in neural activity not explained by other linguistic features and even extending to the recruitment of visual regions beyond classical language areas. 2) The neural signature for reasoning is temporally distinct, peaking later ( 350-400ms) than signals related to lexicon, syntax, and meaning, consistent with its position atop a processing hierarchy. 3) Standard, non-disentangled LLM embeddings can be misleading, as their predictive success is primarily attributable to linguistically shallow features, masking the more subtle contributions of deeper cognitive processing. Our work provides compelling neural evidence for an abstract reasoning computation during language comprehension and offers a robust framework for mapping distinct cognitive functions from artificial models to the human brain 2 .
A growing body of work has shown that LLMs exhibit strong representational alignment with human brain activity during language comprehension. These studies employ language encoding models, powerful predictors of measured brain activity in response to a language stimulus [41,19,10,20,38,5,13,34,17,7,27,2,3,8,9]. Typically, these models are created by inputting a language stimulus into an LLM, to create a contextual embedding of the stimulus using the models' internal hidden state. A linear mapping is then learned between these hidden states and the measured brain response to that stimulus. Modern language encoding models represent some of the most advanced computational approaches for studying neural processing across sensory modalities, and they provide a unique window into the semantic processing landscape of human cortex. * Equal Contribution. 2 Code available here. 39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2025).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bebe6fe0-8a9d-405e-9cc4-cc16134f5932Builds on8
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRIRichard J. Antonello, Aditya R. Vaidya, Alexander HuthNeurIPS 2023 · 137 citations
- Self-Supervised Models of Audio Effectively Explain Human Cortical Responses to SpeechAditya R. Vaidya, Shailee Jain, Alexander HuthICML 2022 · 81 citations
- Joint processing of linguistic properties in brains and language modelsSubba Reddy Oota, Manish Gupta, Mariya TonevaNeurIPS 2023 · 64 citations
- Low-dimensional Structure in the Space of Language Representations is Reflected in Brain ResponsesRichard J. Antonello, Javier S. Turek, Vy Ai Vo, Alexander HuthNeurIPS 2021 · 60 citations
Related papers
- When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual ReasonersWeixiang Zhao, Jiahe Guo, Yang Deng, Tongtong Wu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Do Large Language Models Think like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidences from Layer-Wise Embeddings and fMRIYu Lei, Xingyang Ge, Yi Zhang, Yiming Yang et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Abstraction Induces the Brain Alignment of Language and Speech ModelsEmily Cheng, Aditya Vaidya, Richard AntonelloICML 2026
- From Five Dimensions to Many: Large Language Models as Precise and Interpretable Psychological ProfilersYi-Fei Liu, Yi-Long Lu, Di He, Hang ZhangICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Reasoning Compartmentalization: Bridging the Concretization Gap via Abstraction-based RoutingLing-I Wu, Jian Tong, Yu Sun, Xuan Gao et al.ICML 2026
