Drones' Cryptanalysis - Smashing Cryptography with a Flicker
Ben Nassi, Raz Ben-Netanel, Adi Shamir, Yuval Elovici
Abstract
In an "open skies" era in which drones fly among us, a new question arises: how can we tell whether a passing drone is being used by its operator for a legitimate purpose (e.g., delivering pizza) or an illegitimate purpose (e.g., taking a peek at a person showering in his/her own house)? Over the years, many methods have been suggested to detect the presence of a drone in a specific location, however since populated areas are no longer off limits for drone flights, the previously suggested methods for detecting a privacy invasion attack are irrelevant. In this paper, we present a new method that can detect whether a specific POI (point of interest) is being video streamed by a drone. We show that applying a periodic physical stimulus on a target/victim being video streamed by a drone causes a watermark to be added to the encrypted video traffic that is sent from the drone to its operator and how this watermark can be detected using interception. Based on this method, we present an algorithm for detecting a privacy invasion attack. We analyze the performance of our algorithm using four commercial drones (DJI Mavic Air, Parrot Bebop 2, DJI Spark, and DJI Mavic Pro). We show how our method can be used to (1) determine whether a detected FPV (first-person view) channel is being used to video stream a POI by a drone, and (2) locate a spying drone in space; we also demonstrate how the physical stimulus can be applied covertly. In addition, we present a classification algorithm that differentiates FPV transmissions from other suspicious radio transmissions. We implement this algorithm in a new invasion attack detection system which we evaluate in two use cases (when the victim is inside his/her house and when the victim is being tracked by a drone while driving his/her car); our evaluation shows that a privacy invasion attack can be detected by our system in about 2-3 seconds.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get bea54734-0753-4d45-b3d8-9505c2aaef0dCited by top-tier papers9
- SoK: Security and Privacy in the Age of Commercial DronesBen Nassi, Ron Bitton, Ryusuke Masuoka, Asaf Shabtai et al.S&P 2021 · 89 citations
- I Always Feel Like Somebody's Sensing Me! A Framework to Detect, Identify, and Localize Clandestine Wireless SensorsAkash Deep Singh, Luis Garcia, Joseph Noor, Mani B. SrivastavaUSENIX Security 2021 · 47 citations
- Turnpike: Lightweight Soft Error Resilience for In-Order CoresJianping Zeng, Hongjune Kim, Jaejin Lee, Changhee JungMICRO 2021 · 17 citations
- Privaros: A Framework for Privacy-Compliant Delivery DronesRakesh Rajan Beck, Abhishek Vijeev, Vinod GanapathyCCS 2020 · 15 citations
- Eye of Sauron: Long-Range Hidden Spy Camera Detection and Positioning with Inbuilt Memory EM RadiationQibo Zhang, Daibo Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Zhichao Cao et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Wi-Fly?: Detecting Privacy Invasion Attacks by Consumer DronesSimon Birnbach, Richard Baker, Ivan MartinovicNDSS 2017 · 58 citations
- DronePrint: Acoustic Signatures for Open-set Drone Detection and Identification with Online DataHarini Kolamunna, Thilini Dahanayaka, Junye Li, Suranga Seneviratne et al.UbiComp 2021 · 51 citations
- Drone Security and the Mysterious Case of DJI's DroneIDNico Schiller, Merlin Chlosta, Moritz Schloegel, Nils Bars et al.NDSS 2023
- Non-cooperative wi-fi localization & its privacy implicationsAli Abedi, Deepak VasishtMobiCom 2022 · 30 citations
- C-14: assured timestamps for drone videosZhipeng Tang, Fabien Delattre, Pia Bideau, Mark D. Corner et al.MobiCom 2020 · 4 citations
