"I Felt Bad After We Ignored Her": Understanding How Interface-Driven Social Prominence Shapes Group Discussions with GenAI
Janet G. Johnson, Ruijie Sophia Huang, Khoa Nguyen, Ji Young Nam, Michael Nebeling
Abstract
Recent advancements in the conversational and social capabilities of generative AI (GenAI) have sparked interest in its role as an agent capable of actively participating in human-AI group discussions. Despite this momentum, we don’t fully understand how GenAI shapes conversational dynamics or how the interface design impacts its influence on the group. In this paper, we introduce interface-driven social prominence as a design lens for collaborative GenAI systems. We then present a GenAI-based conversational agent that can actively engage in spoken dialogue during video calls and design three distinct collaboration modes that vary the social prominence of the agent by manipulating its presence in the shared space and the degree of control users have over its participation. A mixed-methods within-subjects study, in which 18 dyads engaged in realistic discussions with a GenAI agent, offers empirical insights into how communication patterns and the collective negotiation of GenAI’s influence shift based on how it is embedded into the collaborative experience. Based on these findings, we outline design implications for supporting the coordination and critical engagement required in human-AI groups.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bea1ccd2-1a3b-4ddd-937c-b82865354115Builds on32
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-MakingHelena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Tobias Gerstenberg et al.CSCW 2023 · 362 citations
- The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AILev Tankelevitch, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, Ava Elizabeth Scott et al.CHI 2024 · 279 citations
- Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing SystemsJoon Sung Park, Lindsay Popowski, Carrie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2022 · 192 citations
Related papers
- Exploring Collaborative GenAI Agents in Synchronous Group Settings: Eliciting Team Perceptions and Design Considerations for the Future of WorkJanet G. Johnson, Macarena Peralta, Mansanjam Kaur, Ruijie Sophia Huang et al.CSCW 2025 · 16 citations
- Generative AI in Children's Creative Collaboration: Impact, Perception, and Design GuidelinesDaeun Yoo, Michele Newman, Caroline Pitt, Kevin Huu Vo et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- AI as an Agent and Collaborative Space: Exploring the role of Generative AI in Small Group Synchronous and Asynchronous Collaborative DynamicsHaowei Xu, Ahmed Kharrufa, Ellis Solaiman, Vasilis VlachokyriakosCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- When Teams Embrace AI: Human Collaboration Strategies in Generative Prompting in a Creative Design TaskYuanning Han, Ziyi Qiu, Jiale Cheng, Ray LCCHI 2024 · 103 citations
- When Designers Sweat: Behavioral Traces of GenAI Co-CreationElena Cavallin, Simone SpagnolCHI 2026 · 2 citations
