Speech-Audio Compositional Attacks on Multimodal LLMs and Their Defense with SALMONN-Guard
Yudong Yang, Xuezhen Zhang, Zhifeng Han, Siyin Wang, Jimin Zhuang, Zengrui Jin, Jing Shao, Guangzhi Sun, Chao Zhang
Abstract
Recent progress in LLMs has enabled understanding of audio signals, but has also exposed new safety risks arising from complex audio inputs that are inadequately handled by current safeguards. We introduce SACRED-Bench (Speech-Audio Composition for RED-teaming) to evaluate the robustness of LLMs under complex audio-based attacks. Unlike existing perturbation-based methods that rely on noise optimization or white-box access, SACRED-Bench exploits speech-audio composition to enable effective black-box attacks. SACRED-Bench adopts three composition mechanisms: (a) overlap of harmful and benign speech, (b) mixture of benign speech with harmful non-speech audio, and (c) multi-speaker dialogue. These mechanisms focus on evaluating safety in settings where benign and harmful intents co-occur within a single auditory scene. Moreover, questions in SACRED-Bench are designed to implicitly refer to content in the audio, such that no explicit harmful information appears in the text prompt alone. Experiments demonstrate that even Gemini 2.5 Pro, a state-of-the-art proprietary LLM with safety guardrails fully enabled, still exhibits a 66% attack success rate. To bridge this gap, we propose SALMONN-Guard, the first guard model that jointly inspects speech, audio, and text for safety judgments, reducing the attack success rate to 20%. Our results highlight the need for audio-aware defenses to ensure the safety of multimodal LLMs. The dataset and SALMONN-Guard checkpoints can be found at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ tsinghua-ee/SACRED-Bench .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext be8bf2f0-6f6e-4545-b07f-62131e6925b9Builds on13
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackJosef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Ruiyang Sun, Jiaming Ji et al.ICLR 2024 · 656 citations
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
- Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting GenerationYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Mengzhou Xia, Kai Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 481 citations
Related papers
- JALMBench: Benchmarking Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in Audio Language ModelsZifan Peng, Yule Liu, Zhen Sun, Mingchen Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- ALMGuard: Safety Shortcuts and Where to Find Them as Guardrails for Audio-Language ModelsWeifei Jin, Yuxin Cao, Junjie Su, Minhui Xue et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- MULTIGUARD: An Efficient Approach for AI Safety Moderation Across Languages and ModalitiesSahil Verma, Keegan Hines, Jeff A. Bilmes, Charlotte Siska et al.EMNLP 2025
- Audio Jailbreak: An Open Comprehensive Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Audio-Language ModelsZirui Song, Qian Jiang, Mingxuan Cui, Mingzhe Li et al.ACL 2026 · 20 citations
- SPIRIT: Patching Speech Language Models against Jailbreak AttacksAmirbek Djanibekov, Nurdaulet Mukhituly, Kentaro Inui, Hanan Aldarmaki et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
