EMNLP Findings2020
The Box is in the Pen: Evaluating Commonsense Reasoning in Neural Machine Translation
Jie He, Tao Wang, Deyi Xiong, Qun Liu
Abstract
Does neural machine translation yield translations that are congenial with common sense? In this paper, we present a test suite to evaluate the commonsense reasoning capability of neural machine translation. The test suite consists of three test sets, covering lexical and contextless/contextual syntactic ambiguity that requires commonsense knowledge to resolve. We manually create 1,200 triples, each of which contain a source sentence and two contrastive translations, involving 7 different common sense types. Language models pretrained on large-scale corpora, such as BERT, GPT-2, achieve a commonsense reasoning accuracy of lower than 72% on target translations of this test suite. We conduct extensive experiments on the test suite to evaluate commonsense reasoning in neural machine translation and investigate factors that have impact on this capability. Our experiments and analyses demonstrate that neural machine translation performs poorly on commonsense reasoning of the three ambiguity types in terms of both reasoning accuracy ( 60.1%) and reasoning consistency ( 31%). We will release our test suite as a machine translation commonsense reasoning testbed to promote future work in this direction.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 10 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent DebateTian Liang, Zhiwei He, Wenxiang Jiao, Xing Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 177 citations
- RuCoLA: Russian Corpus of Linguistic AcceptabilityVladislav Mikhailov, Tatiana Shamardina, Max Ryabinin, Alena Pestova et al.EMNLP 2022 · 19 citations
- Wino-X: Multilingual Winograd Schemas for Commonsense Reasoning and Coreference ResolutionDenis Emelin, Rico SennrichEMNLP 2021 · 12 citations
- Creativity in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems: A SurveyYi-Cheng Lin, Kang-Chieh Chen, Zhe-Yan Li, Tzu-Heng Wu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- A Picture Is Worth a Graph: A Blueprint Debate Paradigm for Multimodal ReasoningChangmeng Zheng, Dayong Liang, Wengyu Zhang, Xiaoyong Wei et al.ACM MM 2024 · 3 citations
Builds on4
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Abductive Commonsense ReasoningChandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Chaitanya Malaviya, Keisuke Sakaguchi et al.ICLR 2020 · 521 citations
- Evaluating Commonsense in Pre-Trained Language ModelsXuhui Zhou, Yue Zhang, Leyang Cui, Dandan HuangAAAI 2020 · 198 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Commonsense Reasoning in Machine Translation: Training, Evaluation and ChallengeXuebo Liu, Yutong Wang, Derek F. Wong, Runzhe Zhan et al.ACL 2023 · 3 citations
- COM2SENSE: A Commonsense Reasoning Benchmark with Complementary SentencesShikhar Singh, Nuan Wen, Yu Hou, Pegah Alipoormolabashi et al.ACL Findings 2021 · 30 citations
- CommonGen: A Constrained Text Generation Challenge for Generative Commonsense ReasoningBill Yuchen Lin, Wangchunshu Zhou, Ming Shen, Pei Zhou et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 239 citations
- G-DAug: Generative Data Augmentation for Commonsense ReasoningYiben Yang, Chaitanya Malaviya, Jared Fernandez, Swabha Swayamdipta et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 110 citations
- Commonsense Knowledge Augmentation for Low-Resource Languages via Adversarial LearningBosung Kim, Juae Kim, Youngjoong Ko, Jungyun SeoAAAI 2021 · 4 citations
