Assistive Communication Technologies and Stigma: How Perceived Visibility of Cochlear Implants Affects Self-Stigma and Social Interaction Anxiety
Pamara F. Chang, Rachel V. Tucker
Abstract
Assistive technologies promise improved functionality for people with disabilities, but their use and adoption are complicated. Previous research has identified several reasons why people with disabilities choose to abandon their assistive technologies. However, less is known about the adoption of assistive technologies that are permanent and user perceptions of these technologies. This study builds upon existing assistive technology, disability, identity, and stigma literature by examining the role of perceptions of cochlear implants, an assistive technology that permanently renders an invisible disability visible, among the single-sided deaf community. Analysis of survey data from 332 single-sided deaf individuals with cochlear implants all over the world revealed that the perceived visibility of assistive technology is positively associated with self-stigma and social interaction anxiety. Results from this study highlight the centrality of sociotechnical perceptions of assistive technologies to the experience of stigma, rather than the objective characteristics and features of technology, and problematize the existing dichotomous approach (visible v. invisible) to understanding assistive technologies. This study also illuminates the importance of studying assistive technologies on an intragroup level as well as focusing on how specific stigmatized niche communities may perceive and use their assistive technologies.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get be509280-212d-4aec-876c-8af7fe89875bCited by top-tier papers3
- "I am both here and there" Parallel Control of Multiple Robotic Avatars by Disabled Workers in a CaféGiulia Barbareschi, Midori Kawaguchi, Hiroaki Kato, Masato Nagahiro et al.CHI 2023 · 31 citations
- Conceptualizing Algorithmic StigmatizationNazanin Andalibi, Cassidy Pyle, Kristen Barta, Lu Xian et al.CHI 2023 · 17 citations
- "I see it as a wellspring for my positive and upward journey in life.": Understanding Current Practices of Assistive Technology's Customized Modification in ChinaKexin Yang, Junyi Wu, Haokun Xin, Jiangtao GongCSCW 2024 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Envisioning the (In)Visibility of Discreet and Wearable AAC DevicesHumphrey Curtis, Zihao You, William Deary, Miruna-Ioana Tudoreanu et al.CHI 2023 · 27 citations
- asEars: Designing and Evaluating the User Experience of Wearable Assistive Devices for Single-Sided DeafnessKen Takaki, Etsushi Nozaki, Tomomi Kanai, Ari Hautasaari et al.CHI 2023 · 10 citations
- Going Beyond the I With CI: an Interview-based Design SpaceClaudia Alessandra Libbi, Robby van Delden, H. Christiaan Stronks, Johan H. M. Frijns et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Toward Inclusive Security and Privacy for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People: A Community-Based Interview StudyMindy Tran, Xinru Tang, Adryana Hutchinson, Adam J. Aviv et al.S&P 2026 · 3 citations
- Pedestrian Detection with Wearable Cameras for the Blind: A Two-way PerspectiveKyungjun Lee, Daisuke Sato, Saki Asakawa, Hernisa Kacorri et al.CHI 2020 · 43 citations
