RGMDT: Return-Gap-Minimizing Decision Tree Extraction in Non-Euclidean Metric Space
Jingdi Chen, Hanhan Zhou, Yongsheng Mei, Carlee Joe-Wong, Gina C. Adam, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Tian Lan
Abstract
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithms have achieved great success in solving many challenging tasks while their black-box nature hinders interpretability and real-world applicability, making it difficult for human experts to interpret and understand DRL policies. Existing works on interpretable reinforcement learning have shown promise in extracting decision tree (DT) based policies from DRL policies with most focus on the single-agent settings while prior attempts to introduce DT policies in multi-agent scenarios mainly focus on heuristic designs which do not provide any quantitative guarantees on the expected return. In this paper, we establish an upper bound on the return gap between the oracle expert policy and an optimal decision tree policy. This enables us to recast the DT extraction problem into a novel non-euclidean clustering problem over the local observation and action values space of each agent, with action values as cluster labels and the upper bound on the return gap as clustering loss. Both the algorithm and the upper bound are extended to multi-agent decentralized DT extractions by an iteratively-grow-DT procedure guided by an action-value function conditioned on the current DTs of other agents. Further, we propose the Return-Gap-Minimization Decision Tree (RGMDT) algorithm, which is a surprisingly simple design and is integrated with reinforcement learning through the utilization of a novel Regularized Information Maximization loss. Evaluations on tasks like D4RL show that RGMDT significantly outperforms heuristic DT-based baselines and can achieve nearly optimal returns under given DT complexity constraints (e.g., maximum number of DT nodes).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext be391fe1-932d-4ee7-a5ba-00f5e42ea420Cited by top-tier papers2
- Retaining Suboptimal Actions to Follow Shifting Optima in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYonghyeon Jo, Sunwoo Lee, Seungyul HanICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- MINT: Minimal Information Neuro-Symbolic Tree for Objective-Driven Knowledge-Gap Reasoning and Active ElicitationZeyu Fang, Mahdi Imani, Tian LanICML 2026
Builds on11
- A Policy-Guided Imitation Approach for Offline Reinforcement LearningHaoran Xu, Li Jiang, Jianxiong Li, Xianyuan ZhanNeurIPS 2022 · 86 citations
- A Scalable MIP-based Method for Learning Optimal Multivariate Decision TreesHaoran Zhu, Pavankumar Murali, Dzung T. Phan, Lam M. Nguyen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 47 citations
- PAC: Assisted Value Factorization with Counterfactual Predictions in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningHanhan Zhou, Tian Lan, Vaneet AggarwalNeurIPS 2022 · 47 citations
- What Did You Think Would Happen? Explaining Agent Behaviour through Intended OutcomesHerman Yau, Chris Russell, Simon HadfieldNeurIPS 2020 · 44 citations
- Bringing Fairness to Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning for Network Utility OptimizationJingdi Chen, Yimeng Wang, Tian LanINFOCOM 2021 · 23 citations
Related papers
- RGMComm: Return Gap Minimization via Discrete Communications in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJingdi Chen, Tian Lan, Carlee Joe-WongAAAI 2024 · 18 citations
- SPOT: Scalable Policy Optimization with Trees for Markov Decision ProcessesXuyuan Xiong, Pedro Chumpitaz-Flores, Kaixun Hua, Cheng HuaNeurIPS 2025
- Iterative Bounding MDPs: Learning Interpretable Policies via Non-Interpretable MethodsNicholay Topin, Stephanie Milani, Fei Fang, Manuela VelosoAAAI 2021 · 45 citations
- Learning Tree Interpretation from Object Representation for Deep Reinforcement LearningGuiliang Liu, Xiangyu Sun, Oliver Schulte, Pascal PoupartNeurIPS 2021 · 16 citations
- Breiman meets Bellman: Non-Greedy Decision Trees with MDPsHector Kohler, Riad Akrour, Philippe PreuxKDD 2025
