Fixed Aggregation Features Can Rival GNNs
Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka Burkholz
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely believed to excel at node representation learning through trainable neighborhood aggregations. We challenge this view by introducing Fixed Aggregation Features (FAFs), a training-free approach that transforms graph learning tasks into tabular problems. This simple shift enables the use of well-established tabular methods, offering strong interpretability and the flexibility to deploy diverse classifiers. Across 14 benchmarks, well-tuned multilayer perceptrons trained on FAFs rival or outperform state-of-the-art GNNs and graph transformers on 12 tasks—often using only mean aggregation. The only exceptions are the Roman Empire and Minesweeper datasets, which typically require unusually deep GNNs. To explain the theoretical possibility of non-trainable aggregations, we connect our findings to Kolmogorov–Arnold representations and discuss when mean aggregation can be sufficient. In conclusion, our results call for (i) richer benchmarks benefiting from learning diverse neighborhood aggregations, (ii) strong tabular baselines as standard, and (iii) employing and advancing tabular models for graph data to gain new insights into related tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext be3359ce-f2a3-4493-9f55-7e9533baad87Builds on29
- How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?Shaked Brody, Uri Alon, Eran YahavICLR 2022 · 1,717 citations
- Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph TransformerLadislav Rampásek, Michael Galkin, Vijay Prakash Dwivedi, Anh Tuan Luu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,216 citations
- Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph NetsGabriele Corso, Luca Cavalleri, Dominique Beaini, Pietro Liò et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 914 citations
- Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvatureJake Topping, Francesco Di Giovanni, Benjamin Paul Chamberlain, Xiaowen Dong et al.ICLR 2022 · 628 citations
- A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph ClassificationFederico Errica, Marco Podda, Davide Bacciu, Alessio MicheliICLR 2020 · 508 citations
Related papers
- Leap of FAITH from GNN-to-MLP: Fairness Aware Inference via DisTillation of GrapH KnowledgeVipul Kumar Singh, Jyotismita Barman, Sandeep Kumar, Tapan K. Gandhi et al.AAAI 2026
- Nimble GNN Embedding with Tensor-Train DecompositionChunxing Yin, Da Zheng, Israt Nisa, Christos Faloutsos et al.KDD 2022 · 14 citations
- A graph similarity for deep learningSeongmin OkNeurIPS 2020 · 16 citations
- NAGphormer: A Tokenized Graph Transformer for Node Classification in Large GraphsJinsong Chen, Kaiyuan Gao, Gaichao Li, Kun HeICLR 2023 · 22 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
