Tree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Models
Mengkang Hu, Yao Mu, Xinmiao Yu, Mingyu Ding, Shiguang Wu, Wenqi Shao, Qiguang Chen, Bin Wang, Yu Qiao, Ping Luo
Abstract
This paper studies close-loop task planning, which refers to the process of generating a sequence of skills (a plan) to accomplish a specific goal while adapting the plan based on real-time observations. Recently, prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate actions iteratively has become a prevalent paradigm due to its superior performance and user-friendliness. However, this paradigm is plagued by two inefficiencies: high token consumption and redundant error correction, both of which hinder its scalability for large-scale testing and applications. To address these issues, we propose Tree-Planner, which reframes task planning with LLMs into three distinct phases: plan sampling, action tree construction, and grounded deciding. Tree-Planner starts by using an LLM to sample a set of potential plans before execution, followed by the aggregation of them to form an action tree. Finally, the LLM performs a top-down decision-making process on the tree, taking into account real-time environmental information. Experiments show that Tree-Planner achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining high efficiency. By decomposing LLM queries into a single plan-sampling call and multiple grounded-deciding calls, a considerable part of the prompt are less likely to be repeatedly consumed. As a result, token consumption is reduced by 92.2% compared to the previously best-performing model. Additionally, by enabling backtracking on the action tree as needed, the correction process becomes more flexible, leading to a 40.5% decrease in error corrections.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext be28f312-d995-481e-9c45-6d34eb1c2665Cited by top-tier papers28
- Unlocking the Capabilities of Thought: A Reasoning Boundary Framework to Quantify and Optimize Chain-of-ThoughtQiguang Chen, Libo Qin, Jiaqi Wang, Jingxuan Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 104 citations
- RoboCodeX: Multimodal Code Generation for Robotic Behavior SynthesisYao Mu, Junting Chen, Qinglong Zhang, Shoufa Chen et al.ICML 2024 · 50 citations
- What Factors Affect Multi-Modal In-Context Learning? An In-Depth ExplorationLibo Qin, Qiguang Chen, Hao Fei, Zhi Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- Cross-lingual Prompting: Improving Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning across LanguagesLibo Qin, Qiguang Chen, Fuxuan Wei, Shijue Huang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 26 citations
- Learning Reward for Robot Skills Using Large Language Models via Self-AlignmentYuwei Zeng, Yao Mu, Lin ShaoICML 2024 · 26 citations
Builds on18
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
- Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative DecodingYaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, Yossi MatiasICML 2023 · 1,472 citations
- LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language ModelsChan Hee Song, Brian M. Sadler, Jiaman Wu, Wei-Lun Chao et al.ICCV 2023 · 685 citations
Related papers
- AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language ModelsHaotian Sun, Yuchen Zhuang, Lingkai Kong, Bo Dai et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 257 citations
- ToolTree: Efficient LLM Tool Planning via Dual-Feedback Monte Carlo Tree Search and Bidirectional PruningShuo Yang, Caren Han, Yihao Ding, Shuhe Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Tree Prompting: Efficient Task Adaptation without Fine-TuningChandan Singh, John X. Morris, Alexander M. Rush, Jianfeng Gao et al.EMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
- Code Driven Planning with Domain-Adaptive SelectorZikang Tian, Shaohui Peng, Di Huang, Jiaming Guo et al.ICLR 2026
- HyperTree Planning: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Hierarchical ThinkingRunquan Gui, Zhihai Wang, Jie Wang, Chi Ma et al.ICML 2025
