Lune

ACL Findings2025

Texts or Images? A Fine-grained Analysis on the Effectiveness of Input Representations and Models for Table Question Answering

Wei Zhou, Mohsen Mesgar, Heike Adel, Annemarie Friedrich

Abstract

In table question answering (TQA), tables are encoded as either texts or images. Prior work suggests that passing images of tables to multimodal large language models (MLLMs) performs comparably to or even better than using textual input with large language models (LLMs). However, the lack of controlled setups limits fine-grained distinctions between these approaches. In this paper, we conduct the first controlled study on the effectiveness of several combinations of table representations and models from two perspectives: question complexity and table size. We build a new benchmark based on existing TQA datasets. In a systematic analysis of seven pairs of MLLMs and LLMs, we find that the best combination of table representation and model varies across setups. We propose FRES, a method selecting table representations dynamically, and observe a 10% average performance improvement compared to using both representations indiscriminately.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 2 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers2

  1. TABLET: A Large-Scale Dataset for Robust Visual Table UnderstandingIñigo Alonso, Imanol Miranda, Eneko Agirre, Mirella LapataICLR 2026 · 5 citations
  2. Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and EvaluationWei Zhou, Bolei Ma, Annemarie Friedrich, Mohsen MesgarACL 2026 · 3 citations

Builds on11

  1. TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL ExecutorQian Liu, Bei Chen, Jiaqi Guo, Morteza Ziyadi et al.ICLR 2022 · 347 citations
  2. ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation DatasetAnkur P. Parikh, Xuezhi Wang, Sebastian Gehrmann, Manaal Faruqui et al.EMNLP 2020 · 69 citations
  3. Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical ReasoningPan Lu, Liang Qiu, Kai-Wei Chang, Ying Nian Wu et al.ICLR 2023 · 41 citations
  4. TaPas: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingJonathan Herzig, Pawel Krzysztof Nowak, Thomas Müller, Francesco Piccinno et al.ACL 2020 · 19 citations
  5. Tables as Texts or Images: Evaluating the Table Reasoning Ability of LLMs and MLLMsNaihao Deng, Zhenjie Sun, Ruiqi He, Aman Sikka et al.ACL Findings 2024 · 15 citations

Related papers

  1. Same Content, Different Representations: A Controlled Study for Table QAYue Zhang, Seiji Maekawa, Nikita BhutaniICLR 2026 · 5 citations
  2. MMTableBench: A Multi-level Multimodal Benchmark for Reasoning and Layout Complexity in Table QAXianjie Wu, Xiaohang Xu, Tingyu Jiang, Jian Yang et al.WWW 2026 · 3 citations
  3. Multimodal Table UnderstandingMingyu Zheng, Xinwei Feng, Qingyi Si, Qiaoqiao She et al.ACL 2024
  4. Weaver: Interweaving SQL and LLM for Table ReasoningRohit Khoja, Devanshu Gupta, Yanjie Fu, Dan Roth et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
  5. SynTab-LLaVA: Enhancing Multimodal Table Understanding with Decoupled SynthesisBangbang Zhou, Zuan Gao, Zixiao Wang, Boqiang Zhang et al.CVPR 2025
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines