USENIX Security2021Top-tier venue
CURE: A Security Architecture with CUstomizable and Resilient Enclaves
Raad Bahmani, Ferdinand Brasser, Ghada Dessouky, Patrick Jauernig, Matthias Klimmek, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi, Emmanuel Stapf
Abstract
Security architectures providing Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) have been an appealing research subject for a wide range of computer systems, from low-end embedded devices to powerful cloud servers. The goal of these architectures is to protect sensitive services in isolated execution contexts, called enclaves. Unfortunately, existing TEE solutions suffer from significant design shortcomings. First, they follow a one-size-fits-all approach offering only a single enclave type, however, different services need flexible enclaves that can adjust to their demands. Second, they cannot efficiently support emerging applications (e.g., Machine Learning as a Service), which require secure channels to peripherals (e.g., accelerators), or the computational power of multiple cores. Third, their protection against cache side-channel attacks is either an afterthought or impractical, i.e., no fine-grained mapping between cache resources and individual enclaves is provided. In this work, we propose CURE, the first security architecture, which tackles these design challenges by providing different types of enclaves: (i) sub-space enclaves provide vertical isolation at all execution privilege levels, (ii) user-space enclaves provide isolated execution to unprivileged applications, and (iii) self-contained enclaves allow isolated execution environments that span multiple privilege levels. Moreover, CURE enables the exclusive assignment of system resources, e.g., peripherals, CPU cores, or cache resources to single enclaves. CURE requires minimal hardware changes while significantly improving the state of the art of hardware-assisted security architectures. We implemented CURE on a RISC-V-based SoC and thoroughly evaluated our prototype in terms of hardware and performance overhead. CURE imposes a geometric mean performance overhead of 15.33% on standard benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bde49684-6ce4-4de0-8a55-3d4aacecfe09Cited by top-tier papers33
- Prime+Scope: Overcoming the Observer Effect for High-Precision Cache Contention AttacksAntoon Purnal, Furkan Turan, Ingrid VerbauwhedeCCS 2021 · 55 citations
- ACAI: Protecting Accelerator Execution with Arm Confidential Computing ArchitectureSupraja Sridhara, Andrin Bertschi, Benedict Schlüter, Mark Kuhne et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 36 citations
- HyperEnclave: An Open and Cross-platform Trusted Execution EnvironmentYuekai Jia, Shuang Liu, Wenhao Wang, Yu Chen et al.USENIX ATC 2022 · 24 citations
- Aion: Enabling Open Systems through Strong Availability Guarantees for EnclavesFritz Alder, Jo Van Bulck, Frank Piessens, Jan Tobias MühlbergCCS 2021 · 21 citations
- Leaky Way: A Conflict-Based Cache Covert Channel Bypassing Set AssociativityYanan Guo, Xin Xin, Youtao Zhang, Jun YangMICRO 2022 · 19 citations
Builds on28
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2019 · 2,435 citations
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- Sanctum: Minimal Hardware Extensions for Strong Software IsolationVictor Costan, Ilia A. Lebedev, Srinivas DevadasUSENIX Security 2016 · 649 citations
- Oblivious Multi-Party Machine Learning on Trusted ProcessorsOlga Ohrimenko, Felix Schuster, Cédric Fournet, Aastha Mehta et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 594 citations
- Inferring Fine-grained Control Flow Inside SGX Enclaves with Branch ShadowingSangho Lee, Ming-Wei Shih, Prasun Gera, Taesoo Kim et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 536 citations
Related papers
- VirTEE: a full backward-compatible TEE with native live migration and secure I/OJianqiang Wang, Pouya Mahmoody, Ferdinand Brasser, Patrick Jauernig et al.DAC 2022 · 11 citations
- HyperTEE: A Decoupled TEE Architecture with Secure Enclave ManagementYunkai Bai, Peinan Li, Yubiao Huang, Michael C. Huang et al.MICRO 2024 · 5 citations
- Elasticlave: An Efficient Memory Model for EnclavesJason Zhijingcheng Yu, Shweta Shinde, Trevor E. Carlson, Prateek SaxenaUSENIX Security 2022
- Keystone: an open framework for architecting trusted execution environmentsDayeol Lee, David Kohlbrenner, Shweta Shinde, Krste Asanovic et al.EuroSys 2020 · 381 citations
- TEESec: Pre-Silicon Vulnerability Discovery for Trusted Execution EnvironmentsMoein Ghaniyoun, Kristin Barber, Yuan Xiao, Yinqian Zhang et al.ISCA 2023 · 6 citations
