Uncovering Latent Memories in Large Language Models
Sunny Duan, Mikail Khona, Abhiram Iyer, Rylan Schaeffer, Ila R. Fiete
Abstract
Frontier AI systems are making transformative impacts across society, but such benefits are not without costs: models trained on web-scale datasets containing personal and private data raise profound concerns about data privacy and misuse. Language models are trained on extensive corpora including potentially sensitive or proprietary information, and the risk of data leakage, where the model response reveals pieces of such information, remains inadequately understood. Prior work has demonstrated that sequence complexity and the number of repetitions are the primary drivers of memorization. In this work, we examine the most vulnerable class of data: highly complex sequences that are presented only once during training. These sequences, often containing the most sensitive information, pose a considerable risk if memorized. By analyzing the progression of memorization for these sequences throughout training, we uncover a striking observation: many memorized sequences persist in the model's memory, exhibiting resistance to catastrophic forgetting even after just one encounter. Surprisingly, these sequences may not appear memorized immediately after their first exposure but can later be "uncovered" during training, even in the absence of subsequent exposures -a phenomenon we call "latent memorization." Latent memorization presents a serious challenge for data privacy, as sequences that seem hidden at the final checkpoint of a model may still be easily recoverable. We demonstrate how these hidden sequences can be revealed through random weight perturbations, and we introduce a diagnostic test based on cross-entropy loss to accurately identify latent memorized sequences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bdaba4f6-0eac-4f0d-a5d9-662973ed42b4Builds on19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models BetterKatherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang et al.ACL 2022 · 844 citations
- Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2023 · 796 citations
- What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence EstimationVitaly Feldman, Chiyuan ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 674 citations
Related papers
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language ModelsChiyuan Zhang, Daphne Ippolito, Katherine Lee, Matthew Jagielski et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 184 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language ModelsNikhil Kandpal, Eric Wallace, Colin RaffelICML 2022 · 395 citations
- Memorization Sinks: Isolating Memorization during LLM TrainingGaurav Rohit Ghosal, Pratyush Maini, Aditi RaghunathanICML 2025
- Emergent and Predictable Memorization in Large Language ModelsStella Biderman, USVSN Sai Prashanth, Lintang Sutawika, Hailey Schoelkopf et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 205 citations
