Causal Explanation-Guided Learning for Organ Allocation
Alessandro Marchese, Jeroen Berrevoets, Sam Verboven
Abstract
A central challenge in organ transplantation is the extremely low acceptance rate of donor organ offers—typically in the single digits—leading to high discard rates and suboptimal use of available grafts. Current acceptance models embedded in allocation systems are non-causal, trained on observational data, and fail to generalize to policy-relevant counterfactuals. This limits their reliability for both policy evaluation and simulator-based optimization. In this work, we reframe organ offer acceptance as a counterfactual prediction problem and propose a method to learn from routinely recorded—but often overlooked—refusal explanations. These refusal reasons act as direction-only counterfactual signals: for example, a refusal reason such as " old donor age " implies acceptance might have occurred had the donor been younger. We formalize this setting and introduce C LEX N ET , a novel causal model that learns policy-invariant representations via balanced training and an explanation-guided augmentation loss. On both synthetic and semi-synthetic data, C LEX N ET outperforms existing acceptance models in predictive performance, generalization, and calibration, offering a robust drop-in improvement for simulators and allocation policy evaluation. Beyond transplantation, our approach provides a general method for incorporating human direction-only explanations as a form of model supervision, improving performance in settings where only observational data is available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bd3c0865-0905-422e-bf5b-d6e24b1c286fBuilds on6
- Performative PredictionJuan C. Perdomo, Tijana Zrnic, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 422 citations
- Estimating counterfactual treatment outcomes over time through adversarially balanced representationsIoana Bica, Ahmed M. Alaa, James Jordon, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2020 · 224 citations
- Certified Monotonic Neural NetworksXingchao Liu, Xing Han, Na Zhang, Qiang LiuNeurIPS 2020 · 116 citations
- OrganITE: Optimal transplant donor organ offering using an individual treatment effectJeroen Berrevoets, James Jordon, Ioana Bica, Alexander Gimson et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 51 citations
- Learning Queueing Policies for Organ Transplantation Allocation using Interpretable Counterfactual Survival AnalysisJeroen Berrevoets, Ahmed M. Alaa, Zhaozhi Qian, James Jordon et al.ICML 2021 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Explanation Consistency Training: Facilitating Consistency-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with InterpretabilityTao Han, Wei-Wei Tu, Yufeng LiAAAI 2021 · 25 citations
- Closing the loop in medical decision support by understanding clinical decision-making: A case study on organ transplantationYuchao Qin, Fergus Imrie, Alihan Hüyük, Daniel Jarrett et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 7 citations
- Inverse Contextual Bandits: Learning How Behavior Evolves over TimeAlihan Hüyük, Daniel Jarrett, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2022 · 14 citations
- Counterfactual Concept Bottleneck ModelsGabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini, Martin Gjoreski et al.ICLR 2025
- Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary PoliciesAlex J. Chan, Alicia Curth, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2022 · 8 citations
