Initializing Services in Interactive ML Systems for Diverse Users
Avinandan Bose, Mihaela Curmei, Daniel L. Jiang, Jamie H. Morgenstern, Sarah Dean, Lillian J. Ratliff, Maryam Fazel
Abstract
This paper investigates ML systems serving a group of users, with multiple models/services, each aimed at specializing to a sub-group of users. We consider settings where upon deploying a set of services, users choose the one minimizing their personal losses and the learner iteratively learns by interacting with diverse users. Prior research shows that the outcomes of learning dynamics, which comprise both the services' adjustments and users' service selections, hinge significantly on the initialization. However, finding good initializations faces two main challenges: (i) Bandit feedback: Typically, data on user preferences are not available before deploying services and observing user behavior; (ii) Suboptimal local solutions: The total loss landscape (i.e., the sum of loss functions across all users and services) is not convex and gradient-based algorithms can get stuck in poor local minima. We address these challenges with a randomized algorithm to adaptively select a minimal set of users for data collection in order to initialize a set of services. Under mild assumptions on the loss functions, we prove that our initialization leads to a total loss within a factor of the globally optimal total loss with complete user preference data, and this factor scales logarithmically in the number of services. This result is a generalization of the well-known -means++ guarantee to a broad problem class, which is also of independent interest. The theory is complemented by experiments on real as well as semi-synthetic datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference LearningSriyash Poddar, Yanming Wan, Hamish Ivison, Abhishek Gupta et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 188 citations
- PrefDisco: Benchmarking Proactive Personalized ReasoningShuyue Stella Li, Avinandan Bose, Faeze Brahman, Simon S. Du et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Learning from Streaming Data when Users ChooseJinyan Su, Sarah DeanICML 2024 · 1 citation
- Cold-Start Personalization via Bayesian Adaptive QuestioningAvinandan Bose, Stella Li, Faeze Brahman, Pang Wei Koh et al.ICML 2026
- Policy Design for Two-sided Platforms with Participation DynamicsHaruka Kiyohara, Fan Yao, Sarah DeanICML 2025
Builds on8
- An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated LearningAvishek Ghosh, Jichan Chung, Dong Yin, Kannan RamchandranNeurIPS 2020 · 1,329 citations
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Meta-learning for Mixed Linear RegressionWeihao Kong, Raghav Somani, Zhao Song, Sham M. Kakade et al.ICML 2020 · 70 citations
- How Fine-Tuning Allows for Effective Meta-LearningKurtland Chua, Qi Lei, Jason D. LeeNeurIPS 2021 · 57 citations
- Improved Guarantees for k-means++ and k-means++ ParallelKonstantin Makarychev, Aravind Reddy, Liren ShanNeurIPS 2020 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Algorithms for Sum-Of-Minimum OptimizationLisang Ding, Ziang Chen, Xinshang Wang, Wotao YinICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Preselection BanditsViktor Bengs, Eyke HüllermeierICML 2020 · 7 citations
- FORM: Follow the Online Regularized Meta-Leader for Cold-Start RecommendationXuehan Sun, Tianyao Shi, Xiaofeng Gao, Yanrong Kang et al.SIGIR 2021 · 23 citations
- Personalization Improves Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Federated LearningAlberto Bietti, Chen-Yu Wei, Miroslav Dudík, John Langford et al.ICML 2022 · 67 citations
- A Market for Accuracy: Classification Under CompetitionOhad Einav, Nir RosenfeldICML 2025
