Eligibility Mechanisms: Auctions Meet Information Retrieval
Gagan Goel, Renato Paes Leme, Jon Schneider, David Thompson, Hanrui Zhang
Abstract
The design of internet advertisement systems is both an auction design problem and an information retrieval (IR) problem. As an auction, the designer needs to take the participants incentives into account. As an information retrieval problem, it needs to identify the ad that it is the most relevant to a user out of an enormous set of ad candidates. Those aspects are combined by first having an IR system narrow down the initial set of ad candidates to a manageable size followed by an auction that ranks and prices those candidates. If the IR system uses information about bids, agents could in principle manipulate the system by manipulating the IR stage even when the subsequent auction is truthful. In this paper we investigate the design of truthful IR mechanisms, which we term eligibility mechanisms. We model it as a truthful version of the stochastic probing problem. We show that there is a constant gap between the truthful and non-truthful versions of the stochastic probing problem and exhibit a constant approximation algorithm. En route, we also characterize the set of eligibility mechanisms, which provides necessary and sufficient conditions for an IR system to be truthful. CCS CONCEPTS • Theory of computation → Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bcf044a0-e9eb-4046-90f1-382b659c0a8eCited by top-tier papers5
- Bidder Selection Problem in Position Auctions: A Fast and Simple Algorithm via Poisson ApproximationNikolai Gravin, Yixuan Even Xu, Renfei ZhouWWW 2024 · 3 citations
- Two-stage Auction Design in Online AdvertisingZhikang Fan, Lan Hu, Ruirui Wang, Zhongrui Ma et al.WWW 2025 · 2 citations
- Truthful Bandit Mechanisms for Repeated Two-stage Ad AuctionsHaoming Li, Yumou Liu, Zhenzhe Zheng, Zhilin Zhang et al.KDD 2024 · 1 citation
- GenAuction: A Generative Auction for Online AdvertisingYuchao Ma, Ruohan Qian, Bingzhe Wang, Qi Qi et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Two-Stage Auctions with Bid Refinement for Online AdvertisingYidan Xing, Rui Guo, Yixin Tao, Dagui Chen et al.KDD 2026
Builds on2
- Hitting the High Notes: Subset Selection for Maximizing Expected Order StatisticsAranyak Mehta, Uri Nadav, Alexandros Psomas, Aviad RubinsteinNeurIPS 2020 · 23 citations
- On Designing a Two-stage Auction for Online AdvertisingYiqing Wang, Xiangyu Liu, Zhenzhe Zheng, Zhilin Zhang et al.WWW 2022 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Optimizing Revenue through User Coupon Recommendations in Truthful Online Ad AuctionsXiaodong Liu, Xiao Lin, Yiming Ding, Changcheng Li et al.WWW 2025 · 2 citations
- No-Regret Online Autobidding Algorithms in First-price AuctionsYilin Li, Yuan Deng, Wei Tang, Hanrui ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Calibrated Click-Through AuctionsDirk Bergemann, Paul Dütting, Renato Paes Leme, Song ZuoWWW 2022 · 16 citations
- Risk-Averse and Optimistic Advertiser Incentive Compatibility in Auto-biddingChristopher Liaw, Wennan ZhuICML 2026 · 1 citation
- A Data-Driven Metric of Incentive CompatibilityYuan Deng, Sébastien Lahaie, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Song ZuoWWW 2020 · 18 citations
