Tight Performance Guarantees of Imitator Policies with Continuous Actions
Davide Maran, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello Restelli
Abstract
Behavioral Cloning (BC) aims at learning a policy that mimics the behavior demonstrated by an expert. The current theoretical understanding of BC is limited to the case of finite actions. In this paper, we study BC with the goal of providing theoretical guarantees on the performance of the imitator policy in the case of continuous actions. We start by deriving a novel bound on the performance gap based on Wasserstein distance, applicable for continuous-action experts, holding under the assumption that the value function is Lipschitz continuous. Since this latter condition is hardy fulfilled in practice, even for Lipschitz Markov Decision Processes and policies, we propose a relaxed setting, proving that value function is always Hölder continuous. This result is of independent interest and allows obtaining in BC a general bound for the performance of the imitator policy. Finally, we analyze noise injection, a common practice in which the expert's action is executed in the environment after the application of a noise kernel. We show that this practice allows deriving stronger performance guarantees, at the price of a bias due to the noise addition.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bce693ad-ca4d-489d-b7c1-ac0b4a3edcb9Cited by top-tier papers4
- No-Regret Reinforcement Learning in Smooth MDPsDavide Maran, Alberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini, Marcello RestelliICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Local Linearity: the Key for No-regret Reinforcement Learning in Continuous MDPsDavide Maran, Alberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- How Ensembles of Distilled Policies Improve Generalisation in Reinforcement LearningMax Weltevrede, Moritz A. Zanger, Matthijs T. J. Spaan, Wendelin BoehmerNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Active Fine-Tuning of Multi-Task PoliciesMarco Bagatella, Jonas Hübotter, Georg Martius, Andreas KrauseICML 2025
Builds on1
Related papers
- Provable Guarantees for Generative Behavior Cloning: Bridging Low-Level Stability and High-Level BehaviorAdam Block, Ali Jadbabaie, Daniel Pfrommer, Max Simchowitz et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 44 citations
- TaSIL: Taylor Series Imitation LearningDaniel Pfrommer, Thomas T. C. K. Zhang, Stephen Tu, Nikolai MatniNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- Behavioral Cloning from Noisy DemonstrationsFumihiro Sasaki, Ryota YamashinaICLR 2021 · 94 citations
- Diffusion Model-Augmented Behavioral CloningShang-Fu Chen, Hsiang-Chun Wang, Ming-Hao Hsu, Chun-Mao Lai et al.ICML 2024 · 47 citations
- Primal Wasserstein Imitation LearningRobert Dadashi, Léonard Hussenot, Matthieu Geist, Olivier PietquinICLR 2021 · 41 citations
