Lune

ICSE2022Top-tier venue

Testing Time Limits in Screener Questions for Online Surveys with Programmers

Anastasia Danilova, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew Smith, Alena Naiakshina

2022Year
8Citations
6Top-tier citations

Abstract

Recruiting study participants with programming skill is essential for researchers. As programming is not a common skill, recruiting programmers as participants in large numbers is challenging. Platforms like Amazon MTurk or Qualtrics offer to recruit participants with programming knowledge. As this is self-reported, participants without programming experience could still take part, either due to a misunderstanding or to obtain the study compensation. If these participants are not detected, the data quality will suffer. To tackle this, Danilova et al. [11] developed and tested screening tasks to detect non-programmers. Unfortunately, the most reliable screeners were also those that took the most time. Since screeners should take as little time as possible, we examine whether the introduction of time limits allows us to create more efficient (i.e., quicker but still reliable) screeners. Our results show that this is possible and we extend the pool of screeners and make recommendations on how to improve the process.

• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext bcccf554-8725-49ce-a861-b7fe6e43ee3a

Cited by top-tier papers6

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on6

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines